Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed accuses the federal government of undermining democracy, mishandling constitutional reforms, and failing on security.
Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, Somalia’s former president and current leader of the Himilo Qaran Party, has delivered a scathing critique of the federal government’s performance in key areas of governance. Speaking at a press conference in Mogadishu, Ahmed accused the administration of fostering division, undermining democratic principles, and mishandling critical constitutional and electoral processes.
Ahmed took aim at recent amendments to four chapters of the Somali Constitution, asserting that the changes lacked the necessary consensus and risked exacerbating tensions between the federal government and member states. He stressed the importance of inclusivity in constitutional reform, warning that unilateral decisions would further destabilize the fragile federal structure.
“The Somali people deserve constitutional amendments that are achieved through broad consensus, not imposed changes that deepen the divisions in our country,” Ahmed stated.
The former president also criticized the ongoing elections, which are limited to Mogadishu, Baidoa, Dhusamareb, and Jowhar, suggesting they would fragment the nation. Ahmed raised concerns about corruption and alleged that the electoral committee had been registering students from schools and universities to inflate voter rolls in selected districts.
“These elections are not representative or transparent. Simple, corruption-free options are available, but the government seems unwilling to consider them. The question is why?” Ahmed asked.
His remarks highlight long-standing criticisms of Somalia’s electoral process, which many view as opaque and prone to manipulation.
Ahmed’s critique extended to Somalia’s broader governance, particularly security and foreign relations. He accused the government of concentrating power in the hands of a single individual, although he did not specify who he was referring to. This veiled criticism suggests dissatisfaction with the centralization of authority, possibly directed at President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud.
Ahmed’s sharp rebuke underscores the growing discontent with Somalia’s federal government as it struggles to address constitutional disputes, ensure credible elections, and maintain security. His critique also reflects broader fears that recent diplomatic deals could undermine Somalia’s territorial integrity and exacerbate internal divisions.
The former president’s call for reforms and accountability highlights the need for inclusive governance and transparency to navigate Somalia’s complex political landscape. However, achieving such reforms will require overcoming entrenched political rivalries and fostering trust among stakeholders—a daunting task in a nation still recovering from decades of conflict.
As Somalia faces mounting challenges, Ahmed’s critique serves as a reminder of the urgent need for a comprehensive approach to governance that prioritizes unity, democracy, and the protection of national sovereignty.
