A grassroots movement pressures celebrities to take a stand on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza by blocking their social media content.

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

What is the Celebrity ‘Blockout’ Over the War in Gaza?

Social media users have initiated a “blockout” campaign to pressure celebrities into taking a stand on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The blockout involves users blocking the social media accounts of celebrities who they believe are not speaking out or doing enough against Israel’s actions in Gaza amidst its war with Hamas.

How Does the Blockout Work?

On platforms like X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and Instagram, users can mute or block specific accounts. By blocking celebrities, users stop seeing their posts, photos, videos, and sponsored content. This action reduces the celebrities’ engagement metrics and potentially affects their income from social media activities. The goal is to divert attention away from these celebrities’ brands, thereby pressuring them to address the crisis.

Who is Being Blocked?

There isn’t a centralized list of celebrities to be blocked. Participants of the blockout choose whom to block based on personal criteria or suggestions from others. Celebrities from the U.S. and other countries are being targeted. Each social media user must block celebrities individually on each platform they use.

Origins of the Blockout

The blockout gained momentum following the recent Met Gala, a high-profile event known for its extravagant fashion displays. As images from the gala circulated online, they were juxtaposed with distressing images from Gaza, highlighting the stark contrast between the opulence of the event and the ongoing humanitarian crisis. This led to increased scrutiny of celebrities’ responses, or lack thereof, to the situation in Gaza.

Will the Blockout Be Effective?

The long-term effectiveness of the blockout remains uncertain. According to Beth Fossen, an assistant professor of marketing at Indiana University, the impact may vary depending on the celebrity’s brand and public persona. Celebrities known for their humanitarian efforts may face more significant backlash for their silence compared to those whose fame is primarily based on their talent or other attributes.

Blockout Backlash

The blockout has faced criticism from some quarters. Detractors argue that focusing on celebrities detracts from the real issues on the ground in Gaza. There are also debates about what constitutes adequate action or statements from celebrities, adding complexity to the movement’s goals.

In conclusion, the celebrity blockout is a digital protest aimed at leveraging social media dynamics to push celebrities into taking a public stand on the Gaza conflict. While its long-term effectiveness is yet to be determined, the movement highlights the growing expectation for public figures to engage with pressing global issues. The blockout also reflects broader tensions about how social media influences activism and accountability in the digital age.

Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni has endorsed ODM leader Raila Odinga for the chairmanship of the African Union Commission (AUC). During his state visit to Kenya, Museveni reaffirmed his support, emphasizing the shared vision of a united East African Community (EAC).

Despite backing from EAC member countries, Odinga faces significant competition. Somalia has nominated former Foreign Minister Fawzia Yusuf Adam, garnering substantial support from the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Additionally, Seychelles supports former Vice President Vincent Meriton. Djibouti’s Foreign Minister, Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, is also in the race.

Raila Odinga, endorsed by EAC countries, aims to succeed the current AUC chair, Moussa Faki Mahamat, whose term ends in February 2025. Odinga, known for his long-standing political influence in Kenya, seeks to bring his vision of unity and progress to the continental stage.

Somalia’s candidate, Fawzia Yusuf Adam, has secured over half the total support from African nations, thanks to backing from the OIC. Her candidature introduces a significant challenge to Odinga, highlighting the intense competition for the AUC chairmanship.

Somalia’s candidate, Fawzia Yusuf Adam

Seychelles has put forward Vincent Meriton, a seasoned diplomat with a focus on improving executive decision implementation at the AU. His entry further complicates the race, showcasing the diverse array of experienced candidates vying for the position.

In conclusion, the race for the AUC chairmanship is heating up, with strong candidates from across the continent. Museveni’s endorsement of Odinga signifies a strategic alignment within the EAC, but the competition remains fierce with significant support for candidates from Somalia and Seychelles.

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

May 18th marks a significant day in the hearts of Somalilanders as they celebrate their Independence Day, commemorating 33 years since reclaiming their sovereignty from Somalia. This day is steeped in history, resilience, and pride, dating back to May 18, 1991, when the Burao Conference declared Somaliland’s independence. This article delves into the significance of this celebration, the historical journey, and the aspirations for the future.

Historical Context

Somaliland’s quest for independence is rooted in its colonial past. On June 26, 1960, Somaliland gained independence from the United Kingdom. However, this independence was short-lived as it voluntarily joined with Somalia five days later to form the Somali Republic. The union, however, was fraught with challenges, leading to decades of civil unrest and disenfranchisement for Somalilanders.

The pivotal moment came in 1991, amidst the collapse of the Somali government, when the Burao Conference gathered representatives from all regions of Somaliland. This conference was a watershed moment, where extensive consultations led to the unanimous decision to reclaim Somaliland’s sovereignty. This bold step marked the beginning of a new era for Somaliland.

Significance of the Celebration

Celebrating 33 years of independence is not merely a reflection of the past but a celebration of Somaliland’s resilience, achievements, and aspirations. The day is marked with parades, speeches, and cultural performances across the country, with Hargeisa, the capital, becoming a hub of festivities. Government officials, political leaders, students, and the military participate in these events, showcasing national unity and pride.

Commemorating Sacrifices and Achievements

The celebration is a tribute to the sacrifices made by Somalilanders to achieve freedom, security, and stability. It is a day to honor the progress made since 1991, including the establishment of a constitution, a functioning government, a robust military and police force, and the successful transfer of power between five presidents.

Despite not being recognized internationally, Somaliland has made significant strides in governance, security, and economic development. It stands as a beacon of stability and democracy in the Horn of Africa, a testament to what can be achieved through determination and unity.

Looking to the Future

The 33rd anniversary is not just a time for reflection but also an opportunity to look ahead. Somalilanders remind themselves of their responsibility to defend their hard-won freedom and sovereignty. This day symbolizes hope for international recognition, a goal that remains elusive but ever-present in the hearts of the people.

The upcoming presidential election on November 13, 2024, adds to the significance of this year’s celebration. Over 1.2 million registered voters are set to participate, showcasing the strength of Somaliland’s democratic processes. This election, delayed due to regional conflicts, is a crucial step in reaffirming Somaliland’s commitment to democracy and good governance.

Strengthening National Unity

This year’s celebrations are particularly poignant given the challenges faced in the past year, including the Lasanod conflict. The unity displayed by Somalilanders in the face of external threats is a testament to their resilience. The festivities serve as a rallying point to strengthen national unity and solidarity.

Diaspora Celebrations

The Somaliland Diaspora plays a vital role in these celebrations, organizing events across Europe, North America, the Middle East, and Africa. These gatherings not only celebrate Somaliland’s independence but also promote its achievements on the international stage. The Diaspora’s efforts are crucial in advocating for Somaliland’s recognition and showcasing the country’s progress.

Cultural Significance

The national flag is a central symbol during the celebrations, with Somalilanders displaying it proudly on their homes, cars, and clothing. School children wave the flag in parades, and traditional songs and dances are performed, highlighting the rich cultural heritage of Somaliland. The flag represents not just the country’s identity but also the pride and unity of its people.

The Role of Youth

Somaliland’s youth are at the forefront of the celebrations, embodying the spirit and hope of the nation. They participate in various activities, from singing national songs to performing traditional dances, showcasing their patriotism and commitment to the country’s future. Their involvement is a testament to the vibrant and dynamic nature of Somaliland’s younger generation.

Future Prospects: MOU with Ethiopia

An exciting development coinciding with this year’s celebration is the anticipated MOU agreement between Somaliland and Ethiopia, which could pave the way for formal diplomatic recognition. This agreement, which includes the establishment of an Ethiopian naval base in the Red Sea, is seen as a strategic partnership that could enhance regional stability and economic integration. It is a hopeful sign that Somaliland’s quest for international recognition may soon bear fruit.

Conclusion

As Somaliland celebrates its 33rd Independence Day, it stands as a testament to resilience, hope, and progress. Despite the lack of international recognition, Somalilanders have built a stable, democratic, and prosperous nation. The celebrations on May 18th are a reminder of the sacrifices made and the achievements earned, as well as a look forward to a future where Somaliland is recognized and respected on the global stage.

The journey of Somaliland is one of determination and unity, and as they commemorate this significant milestone, the hope for a brighter, recognized future continues to inspire its people. The 33rd anniversary is not just a celebration of the past, but a beacon of hope for what lies ahead for this remarkable nation.

Read also Arabic

Exposing Hypocrisy: The West’s Opposition to Somaliland-Ethiopia MoU

Betrayal Exposed: How International Coalition’s Ignorance Fuels Chaos in Somaliland

Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin Pledge Cooperation Against Washington’s Hostile Pressure

BY GUEST ESSAY:

In a bid to counter US influence, China and Russia have reaffirmed their strategic partnership, pledging to work towards a multipolar world and criticizing the US and NATO’s regional military presence.

Russian President Vladimir Putin concluded his two-day trip to China, reaffirming a strategic partnership with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The two leaders criticized US and NATO’s influence in the Indo-Pacific and pledged cooperation against hostile pressures from Washington. They emphasized their commitment to a multipolar world and discussed resolving the Ukraine conflict through political means. Analysts note that Beijing and Moscow aim to challenge the US-led world order, although China remains cautious about committing to a specific strategy regarding the Ukraine war. The meeting reflects a deepening alliance amid growing geopolitical tensions.

During their meetings, Putin expressed Russia’s willingness to collaborate with China and other global south countries to promote a multipolar world order. Xi reiterated the importance of steering global governance in the right direction. Analysts suggest that both leaders want to present their partnership as a positive force in the global system, striving for a more equitable and inclusive economic and political environment.

In addition to their criticisms of the US and NATO, Xi and Putin emphasized the need for a sustainable security system in Eurasia based on equal and indivisible security. This stance reflects their view of Washington and NATO’s expanding military presence in Asia as a zero-sum game. According to Mathieu Duchatel, director of international studies at the French policy group Institut Montaigne, Xi and Putin aim to undermine Washington’s alliance networks in Asia.

As Switzerland prepares to host a peace summit dedicated to the Ukraine war, Xi and Putin exchanged views on the ongoing conflict. They agreed that the war should be resolved through a political settlement. Xi emphasized the importance of establishing a new, balanced, effective, and sustainable security architecture. He suggested that an international peace conference, recognized by both Russia and Ukraine, could be a step towards resolving the conflict.

Putin appreciated China’s objective and balanced stance on the Ukraine issue and reiterated Russia’s commitment to political negotiations. However, analysts like Philipp Ivanov remain skeptical about China’s concrete efforts to resolve the war, noting that China’s peace plan is more diplomatic than substantive.

The meeting between Xi and Putin follows Xi’s five-day trip to Europe, where some analysts believe Beijing sought to exploit disunity within the European Union. Despite repeated warnings from the United States about the consequences of supporting Russia’s war efforts, Beijing seems confident that potential sanctions from the West may not materialize. Ja Ian Chong, a political scientist at the National University of Singapore, suggests that China is testing Europe’s response to its support for Moscow.

Ivanov noted that Putin’s visit to China likely involved discussions on how to circumvent Western sanctions. He anticipates increased transactions and import-export activities through third countries, such as those in Central Asia. Despite Western attempts to pressure China, analysts believe Beijing will continue to uphold its partnership with Moscow, with no significant reduction in Russia’s access to Chinese dual-use technology.

Overall, the strategic partnership between China and Russia appears to be on an upward trajectory, with both countries committed to countering US influence and creating a multipolar world order.

UN agencies warn of catastrophic famine as conflict between Sudan’s rival generals intensifies.

BY GUEST ESSAY:

The humanitarian crisis in Sudan worsens with escalating conflict and a looming famine. UN human rights chief Volker Türk urges Sudanese generals to cease hostilities and ensure humanitarian aid access.

As famine threatens Sudan, the humanitarian crisis is spiraling out of control. The UN’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights reported that UN human rights chief Volker Türk had separate phone calls with Sudan’s rival generals to try to deescalate the conflict.

“The high commissioner warned both commanders that fighting in el-Fasher, where more than 1.8 million residents and internally displaced people are encircled and at imminent risk of famine, would have a catastrophic impact on civilians and would deepen intercommunal conflict with disastrous humanitarian consequences,” said Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the high commissioner, in Geneva on Friday.

The fighting for control of el-Fasher, the last stronghold of the Sudanese Armed Forces in western Darfur, escalated dramatically last week. The United Nations reports that at least 58 civilians have been killed and 213 injured.

During separate telephone conversations with Sudanese Armed Forces Commander Lieutenant-General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Commander of the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, Türk appealed to both generals to put the interests of the people first. He expressed his “deep distress” at the situation in Sudan and urged them to take specific concrete steps to cease hostilities, resume peace negotiations, ensure access to adequate humanitarian assistance, and ensure their troops and allied forces fully respect international humanitarian and human rights law.

Both generals acknowledged the importance of respecting international humanitarian law, and SAF Commander Burhan indicated that he would facilitate visas for more UN human rights staff. Shamdasani highlighted the importance of having more UN staff on the ground to cover the crisis more closely, noting that her office currently has only one international staff member in Port Sudan.

Since the conflict between the SAF and RSF erupted in mid-April 2023, over 15,500 people have been killed, approximately 33,000 others injured, and an estimated 6.8 million have been displaced within the country. Jens Laerke, OCHA spokesperson, stated that half of Sudan’s population, 25 million people, need humanitarian aid. However, efforts to support the most affected are severely underfunded, with only 12% of the UN’s $2.7 billion appeal met.

“This is not just an underfunded appeal; it is a catastrophically underfunded appeal,” Laerke said. “People in Sudan are staring famine in the face.” The World Health Organization (WHO) warns that famine is looming, especially in parts of Darfur and in the capital, Khartoum, with more than one-third of the population facing acute hunger.

Dr. Shible Sahbani, the WHO representative in Sudan, reported a 22% increase in acute malnutrition among under-5 children and pregnant and breastfeeding women, rising from 3.9 million to 4.9 million people in 2024. The recent escalation of violence in Darfur, particularly in el-Fasher, is causing more civilian deaths and injuries, and access to health facilities is being hampered by the ensuing insecurity.

The WHO has recorded 62 verified attacks on healthcare, with two-thirds of Sudan’s 18 states currently experiencing multiple outbreaks of deadly diseases such as cholera, measles, dengue fever, and malaria. These outbreaks are likely to worsen during the upcoming rainy season, making it even harder to reach those in desperate need.

“We stand ready to do more and utilize all available avenues to reach the most vulnerable populations across Sudan, but we need assurances of security for our staff and supplies,” Sahbani said. “Health cannot be ensured in the absence of peace.”

The Federal Criminal Court of Switzerland on Wednesday convicted former Gambian Interior Minister Ousman Sonko for crimes against humanity and sentenced him to 20 years in prison.

BY GUEST ESSAY:

In a landmark ruling, a Swiss court has convicted a former Gambian Interior Minister Ousman Sonko for crimes against humanity, marking a significant victory for justice and accountability. The verdict underscores the global community’s unwavering commitment to holding perpetrators of grave human rights violations accountable, regardless of their position or nationality.

The convicted ex-minister, whose name was not disclosed in the report, stood accused of perpetrating heinous crimes during their tenure in government, including acts of torture, extrajudicial killings, and enforced disappearances. The court’s decision to convict them sends a powerful message that those responsible for egregious human rights abuses will be held to account for their actions, no matter where they seek refuge.

The case represents a triumph for the victims and survivors of the atrocities committed by the ex-minister and their accomplices. It acknowledges their suffering and acknowledges the importance of seeking justice for past injustices. The verdict also serves as a source of hope for victims of human rights abuses worldwide, demonstrating that justice can prevail even in the face of formidable challenges.

Switzerland’s role in prosecuting the ex-minister underscores the country’s commitment to upholding the principles of international law and protecting human rights. By providing a forum for holding perpetrators accountable, Switzerland sets a precedent for other nations to follow suit in pursuing justice for victims of human rights violations.

The conviction of the Gambian ex-minister also highlights the importance of international cooperation in addressing impunity for human rights abuses. It underscores the need for collaboration among countries to investigate and prosecute individuals suspected of committing crimes against humanity, regardless of where the crimes were perpetrated.

While the verdict represents a significant milestone in the pursuit of justice, it also serves as a reminder of the ongoing need to address impunity and prevent future atrocities. It underscores the importance of strengthening national and international legal frameworks to ensure accountability for human rights violations and prevent impunity.

In conclusion, the conviction of the Gambian ex-minister for crimes against humanity represents a significant victory for justice and accountability. It sends a clear message that perpetrators of grave human rights abuses will be held accountable for their actions, and that victims will not be forgotten. As the global community continues to strive for a world free from impunity, this landmark verdict serves as a beacon of hope for all those who seek justice and redress for past atrocities.

Unveiling the Religious, Health, Economic, and Environmental Ravages of Khat Consumption in Somaliland

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

In the tranquil streets of Somaliland, an invisible enemy lurks, threatening the essence of society and corroding its foundations. This enemy is none other than Khat, a narcotic plant wreaking havoc on the religious, health, economic, moral, hygienic, and environmental spheres of Somaliland.

1. Religious Problems of Khat: Khat’s insidious infiltration into the societal fabric of Somaliland has unleashed a myriad of religious challenges. The gluttonous consumption of Khat undermines the completeness of faith, diverting individuals from their religious obligations. Fasting, the cornerstone of religious practice, is undermined by Khat consumption, hindering individuals from fulfilling their sacred duties.
2. Health Problems of Khat: The detrimental impact of Khat on public health cannot be overstated. From neurological impairment to digestive disturbances, Khat inflicts severe harm on the human body. Its consumption weakens the immune system, rendering individuals susceptible to illness and posing grave risks to their overall well-being.
3. Financial Problems of Khat: Khat’s pervasive influence extends to the economic realm, paralyzing communities and draining resources. The economic paralysis induced by Khat consumption disrupts livelihoods and perpetuates cycles of poverty. Scarce financial resources are squandered on Khat, exacerbating economic inequalities and stifling progress.
4. Moral Problems of Khat: In a society anchored in the principles of Islam, Khat engenders moral degradation, eroding the fabric of social cohesion. The vile behavior exhibited by Khat users stands in stark contrast to the moral virtues espoused by Islam, perpetuating discord and disharmony within communities.
5. Hygienic Problems of Khat: Khat’s consumption fosters neglect of personal hygiene, exacerbating societal challenges and perpetuating unhygienic living conditions. The relentless pursuit of Khat leaves individuals devoid of the inclination to maintain cleanliness, further exacerbating public health concerns.
6. Family Problems of Khat: The scourge of Khat precipitates familial discord, tearing apart the fabric of familial bonds and disrupting domestic tranquility. Marital strife, fueled by the financial strain of Khat consumption, destabilizes households and undermines familial cohesion.
7. Environmental Problems of Khat: As Khat consumption proliferates, it exacts a heavy toll on the environment, polluting ecosystems and despoiling landscapes. The wanton disposal of Khat waste contaminates soil and disrupts natural habitats, threatening biodiversity and compromising environmental sustainability.

Conclusion: The pernicious influence of Khat permeates every facet of Somaliland society, leaving devastation in its wake. Urgent measures are imperative to combat this existential threat and safeguard the future of Somaliland. Only through concerted efforts to address the religious, health, economic, moral, hygienic, and environmental ramifications of Khat consumption can Somaliland reclaim its vitality and resilience.

The Poisoned Chalice: Battling the Khat Epidemic in Somaliland

In the face of adversity, Somaliland must unite to confront the scourge of Khat and forge a path towards renewal and prosperity.