







In his return to power, President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominations are proving to be as contentious as his campaign promises. The selections of Congressman Matt Gaetz for attorney general, former Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence, and Fox News anchor Pete Hegseth as defense secretary have sparked immediate backlash within Washington. While these choices align with Trump’s “drain the swamp” rallying cry, they have left some Republican senators reeling. For Trump, however, outrage seems intentional—a calculated move to affirm his anti-establishment agenda and display unyielding loyalty to his base.
Gaetz for Attorney General: A Controversial Choice
The nomination of Gaetz, one of Trump’s staunchest allies and a figure dogged by legal controversy, is perhaps the boldest of Trump’s recent appointments. Gaetz resigned from Congress shortly before the announcement, a move that avoided a House Ethics Committee report on allegations involving misconduct, improper gifts, and attempts to obstruct investigations. While Gaetz denies any wrongdoing, his nomination is poised to become a litmus test for Trump’s intent in the Justice Department.
In announcing his pick, Trump highlighted the need to end the “partisan weaponization” of the justice system, signaling his desire for an attorney general who will aggressively defend his administration and target perceived enemies. Gaetz’s support for disbanding the FBI and DOJ unless they “come to heel” aligns with Trump’s skepticism toward these institutions, furthering the view that his administration will seek retribution against what Trump has described as a “deep state” bent on undermining him.
The potential confirmation battle over Gaetz will test Senate Republicans, many of whom are already balking at the nomination. Senators Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, two of Trump’s GOP critics, expressed strong reservations, with Murkowski dismissing Gaetz as “unserious.” Newly elected Senate Majority Leader John Thune is already facing pressure to support the nomination—a trial that could shape his relationship with a president-elect eager to maintain absolute control over his party.
Tulsi Gabbard: A Loyalty Pick for Intelligence Chief
Gabbard’s nomination as director of national intelligence is similarly emblematic of Trump’s strategy. A former Democratic congresswoman with a record of challenging her party, Gabbard has voiced skepticism about U.S. intelligence agencies and supported Trump’s claims of political targeting. Known for doubting U.S. assertions that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad committed war crimes, Gabbard has been criticized by both parties as overly sympathetic to authoritarian regimes. Her nomination is seen as a rebuke to intelligence officials Trump has accused of undermining him since his first term.
By placing Gabbard in a role historically tasked with upholding objective intelligence, Trump underscores his desire to reshape the intelligence community in line with his worldview. Her appointment is a nod to Trump’s base, who view her as a disruptive force capable of overhauling an intelligence structure they believe has worked against the president.
Hegseth at the Pentagon: Culture Warrior or Defense Secretary?
The choice of Pete Hegseth for defense secretary further emphasizes Trump’s alignment with figures who reflect his political ideology over deep expertise. Though Hegseth is a veteran of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, his role as a Fox News commentator—often critical of military diversity programs and progressive Pentagon policies—speaks to his appeal to Trump’s conservative supporters. Critics argue that Hegseth lacks the strategic and diplomatic experience typically expected of a defense secretary, potentially leaving him at a disadvantage in international crises.
Nevertheless, Hegseth’s views align with Trump’s priorities, making him an ideal candidate to champion a culture shift within the Pentagon. His nomination signals Trump’s intent to reshape the military into a less politically diverse institution that reflects the administration’s conservative values.
Loyalty and “God-Tier Trolling”
Commentators see these picks as more than policy statements; they are also calculated provocations. Anthony Scaramucci, Trump’s former communications director, described the nominations as deliberate “trolling” designed to unsettle Washington. Senator John Fetterman likened the Gaetz nomination to “god-tier trolling,” indicating that these moves are meant to energize Trump’s base by challenging the norms of governance and defying liberal critics.
The nominations resonate with Trump’s supporters, who view these figures as agents of disruption. Many of these voters agree with Trump’s critique of U.S. institutions as biased against him, a sentiment galvanized during his first term amid investigations into Russian election interference and Trump’s impeachment proceedings. For Trump’s base, the new administration represents an opportunity to dismantle the status quo they perceive as corrupt and self-serving.
Rubio’s Moderation and an Early Test of Senate Support
Not all of Trump’s choices are confrontational. His pick of Senator Marco Rubio as secretary of state signals a tempered approach in at least one corner of his Cabinet. Rubio, a seasoned voice on foreign policy, especially regarding China, is seen as a reasonable selection likely to garner bipartisan support. Yet even Rubio’s role may hinge on his willingness to embrace Trump’s “America First” ideology, which has reshaped traditional U.S. alliances and stances on global trade.
The Senate’s response to Gaetz’s nomination in particular will set the tone for its relationship with the Trump administration. Trump has already begun pressing GOP senators to swiftly confirm his nominees or, if obstructed, use recess appointments to bypass the Senate. This early clash will reveal the Senate’s willingness to assert its constitutional role against a president who has, in the past, overridden established norms to achieve his goals.
A Prelude to Trump’s Second Term
These nominations preview an administration determined to dismantle institutional obstacles and enact a governance style unbound by traditional checks and balances. With each Cabinet selection, Trump makes clear that loyalty, ideological alignment, and a willingness to challenge the establishment are paramount. This approach resonates with a significant segment of the electorate, promising a volatile tenure as Trump and his appointees pursue what he calls a “second term of retribution.”
As Trump’s inauguration nears, the question remains: Will any Republican senators challenge his choices, or will they rally around a president who sees his election as a mandate to defy convention? The outcome will shape Trump’s second term and redefine the boundaries of executive authority in the modern presidency.
When the lights went out across Spain and Portugal, chaos followed. It wasn’t just a blackout — it was a warning.
A massive blackout crippled Spain, Portugal, and parts of France, exposing how fragile modern life truly is. Chaos erupted on trains, in metros, in streets — and in hearts.
It began as a flicker.
Then the lights failed.
Then the panic began.
Across Spain, Portugal, and parts of France, a massive, unexpected power outage plunged millions into a medieval nightmare — exposing how fragile modern life truly is.
Trains froze mid-journey.
Metros choked with panicked commuters.
Supermarkets shuttered.
Gas stations went dark.
Phones and ATMs blinked off.
Food supplies and communications collapsed within hours.
It wasn’t just an inconvenience — it was a glimpse into systemic collapse.
Peter Hughes never expected his journey to Madrid would turn into an endurance test.
Four hours trapped in a dead train.
No power. No working toilets. No way home.
Across the Iberian Peninsula, hundreds of trains froze, leaving thousands stranded — many without ventilation, water, or clear information.
In the countryside, local villagers became heroes, handing out food and water to stunned passengers.
In Madrid, Lisbon, Valencia, and dozens of other cities, traffic lights collapsed into chaos, public transport died, and businesses slammed their doors shut.
With card payments offline, a desperate cash economy reemerged almost instantly.
Hospitals switched to emergency generators.
Airports barely functioned on backup systems.
And with no reliable mobile data, millions were left in the dark — literally and figuratively.
For many, the experience was more than inconvenient — it was terrifying.
“You realize within an hour how much of your survival depends on invisible systems,” said Eloise Edgington, a stranded copywriter in Barcelona.
When power, money, communication, and movement all collapse at once, the modern world reveals itself as frighteningly brittle.
Authorities rushed to contain the damage.
Power companies promised restoration within hours — but it took much longer. Some areas are still struggling.
Meanwhile, questions linger:
How could an entire modern energy grid collapse so easily?
What would happen if next time it wasn’t just accidental — but deliberate?
If a blackout of this scale can occur without warning, what happens in a real cyberwar, sabotage event, or systemic failure?
Today, it was trains, supermarkets, and traffic lights.
Tomorrow — it could be far worse.
The Iberian blackout wasn’t just a one-day crisis.
It was a dress rehearsal for a new age of fragility.
And most were terrifyingly unprepared.
Early Monday morning, a series of mortar rounds fired by the Al-Shabaab terrorist group struck critical areas inside Mogadishu, including the heavily fortified Halane camp — home to key international agencies — and the electricity infrastructure in Wadajir district, according to initial reports.
Residents and aid workers reported warning sirens and explosions echoing through the area before dawn, triggering fears of wider attacks across Somalia’s fragile capital.
Sources confirm that multiple mortars landed inside Halane, where United Nations missions, embassies, and international NGOs are headquartered.
At the same time, blasts reportedly disrupted sections of the Wadajir power grid, though full details on damage and casualties remain unclear.
Earlier this month, international organizations had issued warnings to their employees stationed inside Halane and nearby facilities, citing a credible threat of incoming Al-Shabaab operations.
This morning’s attack validates those concerns and signals an increasing inability of Somali security forces to secure even the capital’s most protected zones.
As of this publication, the Somali federal government has issued no official statement on the attack, despite a growing pattern of mortar and small-arms strikes throughout Mogadishu in recent weeks.
Security analysts say the repeated attacks underscore:
Al-Shabaab’s operational resilience, despite military pressure.
Somalia’s deteriorating security environment ahead of key international engagements.
The high vulnerability of diplomatic and humanitarian operations in Mogadishu.
The latest strike comes amid a wider offensive resurgence by Al-Shabaab across Somalia’s central and southern regions, while the African Union’s AUSSOM forces report needing 8,000 additional troops to prevent total collapse of gains made in recent years.
Halane camp, once considered a fortress, now faces real and persistent threats, with international workers increasingly questioning how much longer operations can continue under such instability.
Police warn of arrests as political tensions rise before Independence Day; only the official national flag permitted.
Somaliland’s leadership is drawing a sharp red line ahead of its most sacred national day.
In a decisive move, Police Commissioner Abdirahman Abdillahi Hassan, known as Abdi Dheere, announced a sweeping ban on unauthorized flags during the upcoming May 18 Independence Day celebrations.
Only one flag — the official Somaliland national flag — will be tolerated.
Anyone displaying clan banners, political party colors, or alternative symbols will face immediate arrest, according to the new police directive.
“Somaliland has only one recognized flag,” Commissioner Abdi Dheere declared at a Sunday press conference in Hargeisa.
“Our forces have orders to detain anyone violating this directive.”
The crackdown extends to markets, public spaces, and social media, where clan-based and political banners have appeared in growing numbers in recent weeks.
This year’s May 18 commemorations — marking Somaliland’s 1991 break from Somalia — come amid rising political tensions.
Videos have surfaced showing critics of President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi Irro’s administration waving clan flags and calling for alternative celebrations.
Some activists on social media have openly declared plans to organize “independent May 18 events” — a move authorities see as a dangerous fracture of national unity.
For Somaliland’s government, May 18 is more than a holiday — it is a critical platform to demonstrate unity, legitimacy, and sovereignty to the world.
Any public fragmentation — even symbolic — threatens the region’s long-standing quest for international recognition.
The police order is not just about flags — it is about who controls the meaning of Somaliland’s independence.
Officials are determined to prevent political opponents or clan factions from hijacking the day’s symbolism for their own agendas.
On May 18, there will be no divided banners. There will be only Somaliland — or there will be consequences.
A doctor.
A marriage.
A Mercedes-Benz.
A silent epidemic exposed.
When Dr. Celiwe Ndaba opened her heart to South Africa, she didn’t just tell her story —
She pulled the mask off a brutal national reality.
Financial abuse is the new frontline of South Africa’s gender war.
And even success, money, and education are no longer shields.
Across TikTok, Instagram, and living rooms, thousands of women — doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs — are confessing the same nightmare:
They loved.
They gave.
They sacrificed.
And they were economically drained — left holding debts, shame, and broken dreams.
“I paid for his car. His business. His image.
He paid me back with betrayal.”
This is not poverty.
This is not “bad luck.”
This is systemic gender warfare, disguised as love.
South African women face two chains, not one.
At work, they must shine.
At home, they must shrink.
Sociologist Nombulelo Shange calls it “double patriarchy” —
“Western pressure to succeed clashes with traditional demands to serve male egos.”
It’s not enough to become a doctor, lawyer, or CEO.
You must also be the good wife, the silent provider, the eternal fixer of broken promises.
You must pay — and smile while doing it.
Women are out-earning men more than ever in South Africa.
But success has made them targets.
Cultural expectations still whisper:
“A real man provides. A real woman makes him look like he did.”
That’s why women hand their debit cards to boyfriends at restaurants —
Why they co-sign loans for luxury cars they’ll never drive —
Why they cover rent, groceries, school fees, while their partners “manage their pride.”
Financial control becomes emotional domination.
Economic abuse becomes spiritual warfare.
Love becomes debt bondage.
For every woman speaking out, hundreds stay silent — trapped by shame, fear, or misguided hope that sacrifice will heal the wound.
By the time the divorce papers come, the credit cards are maxed out, the bank accounts drained, the dreams postponed.
And society still whispers:
“You should have known better.”
No.
We should have built a society where men know better.
Dr. Ndaba’s story is not just about marriage.
It’s about survival.
Women must understand:
Love without respect is a prison.
Affection without financial dignity is a weapon.
Success without protection is vulnerability.
Love should not cost your freedom.
The gender crash has arrived.
South Africa must choose:
Change the culture — or watch it burn.
Success Made Her a Target: How South African Women Are Being Financially Hunted
🔗 Follow waryatv.com for deep-dive exposes on the gender revolution shaking South Africa.
Confidential Russian diplomatic letters exposed — Somaliland’s foreign diplomacy collapses as Mogadishu capitalizes.
WARYATV exposes how Somaliland’s mishandling and leaks of confidential Russian outreach allowed Mogadishu to steal a historic opportunity.
In a stunning revelation, WARYATV has obtained confidential documents proving that the Russian Foreign Ministry formally proposed opening direct diplomatic engagement with Somaliland — including a strategic visit to Berbera Port.
Instead of seizing the historic opportunity, Somaliland’s Foreign Ministry bungled the moment, leaking highly sensitive communications, and delivering a shockingly unprofessional rejection to Moscow.
Today, Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister landed in Mogadishu, not Hargeisa — marking Russia’s first official visit to Somalia in decades.
Somalia is now capitalizing on the exact opportunity Somaliland foolishly let slip through its fingers.
Russia’s confidential letter clearly outlined:
Plans for “economic and humanitarian cooperation”
Direct diplomatic engagement in Hargeisa
A proposed high-level visit to Berbera Port, critical to Red Sea geopolitics
But in a response that will go down in diplomatic infamy, Somaliland’s Foreign Ministry wrote back:
“Somaliland is unable to accommodate the proposed visit at this time.”
No counter-proposal. No scheduling. No diplomatic finesse. Just a bureaucratic snub — to a global superpower seeking dialogue.
The deliberate circulation of the Russia-Somaliland correspondence within government circles — and now beyond — is not just incompetence.
It is treasonous sabotage.
Exposing confidential interactions with a superpower mid-negotiation is an act of strategic suicide.
Sources confirm this is not the first time internal Somaliland diplomacy has been sabotaged from within — but this one has delivered catastrophic consequences.
Those responsible must be summoned immediately to the presidency for explanation.
There must be accountability — or Somaliland’s foreign policy credibility will collapse entirely.
Russia’s pivot to Mogadishu now reshapes the strategic map of the Horn of Africa — and Somaliland has no one to blame but its own reckless, self-sabotaging officials.
Imagine Somaliland telling Russia, “We’re busy right now… maybe later.” History does not forgive such arrogance or amateurism.
WARYATV will continue exposing the forces undermining Somaliland’s sovereignty from within.
The people deserve better.
New revelations tie Base terror group leader to Russian intelligence, raising alarms over sabotage operations targeting Zelenskyy and Ukraine’s war effort.
The war against Ukraine isn’t just being fought with tanks and drones — it’s being fueled by Russian-backed extremist terror groups hiding in plain sight.
A Guardian investigation has detonated a political bombshell:
Former members of The Base, a white supremacist terror network designated by the EU and UK, now claim their leader, Rinaldo Nazzaro, is a Kremlin spy running covert sabotage operations inside Ukraine.
Rinaldo Nazzaro
The stunning allegations paint a chilling picture:
Nazzaro, a self-proclaimed Pentagon veteran, is accused of secretly working for Russia’s FSB.
Witnesses say he texted fluently in Russian, bragged about flying back and forth to Moscow, and fled to Russia whenever Base members were arrested.
The group’s latest mission in Ukraine — offering cash for assassinations, sabotage, and attacks on infrastructure — allegedly serves direct Kremlin interests.
Videos have surfaced of Base operatives torching Ukrainian military vehicles and targeting critical energy systems — operations designed to destabilize Zelenskyy’s government from within.
Former Base members now admit:
“This wasn’t about ideology. It was about serving Russia’s war machine.”
Adding to the evidence, Nazzaro controls Base propaganda via VK and Mail.ru — both heavily linked to Putin’s information networks. Massive bot purchases and reward payouts hint at deep, invisible financing — from sources far beyond fringe extremists.
Nazzaro denies the charges, even appearing on Russian state TV to proclaim innocence. But the pattern is clear:
The Kremlin is using Western neo-Nazis as expendable weapons to bleed Ukraine from within.
As Ukraine fights on the frontlines, a second, dirtier war — one of sabotage, infiltration, and treachery — is being waged in the shadows. And Russia’s fingerprints are everywhere.
The most powerful photos capturing the ceremony, emotion and tradition in the Vatican as the world says goodbye to Pope Francis.
Ankara secures 90% of Somalia’s oil and gas profits in landmark deal, sparking fears of energy colonialism under the guise of partnership.
Turkey’s new hydrocarbons deal with Somalia grants it 90% of all oil and gas output with zero upfront costs, raising questions about sovereignty, exploitation, and geopolitical consequences in the Horn of Africa.
Turkey didn’t just strike oil in Somalia — it struck gold. In a sweeping hydrocarbons agreement now before the Turkish Parliament, Ankara has secured 90% of Somalia’s oil and gas output, full export rights, zero upfront costs, and even the legal turf of arbitration on its own soil. Welcome to the 21st-century blueprint of “soft conquest” — wrapped in partnership, sealed with military escorts.
Somalia, teetering between internal fragility and global neglect, has offered up its vast offshore reserves to Turkey on terms that defy global industry norms. No signature bonuses. No surface fees. Only 5% royalties capped for Somalia, and Turkish corporations get to walk away with the lion’s share — free to export, sell, and profit without local interference.
This isn’t partnership. It’s a power grab masquerading as cooperation.
Text of the hydrocarbon agreement between Turkey and Somalia.
Worse still, Turkey can assign its rights to any foreign third party without even opening a local office — a clause that opens the door for opaque subcontracts and external interference in Somalia’s maritime zones. Turkish warships, under the pretext of anti-piracy missions, will escort deep-sea drill ships come September. But what they’re really guarding is Ankara’s geopolitical gamble — a stranglehold on East Africa’s most lucrative energy basin.
The optics are troubling. Somalia’s government, seeking legitimacy and allies, is locking itself into a long-term dependency that gives away critical sovereignty in exchange for vague promises of training and defense aid. If oil is supposed to be Somalia’s path to self-reliance, this deal builds a highway — but Turkey is behind the wheel.
As the global energy chessboard tilts eastward, Somalia risks being reduced to a pawn — or worse, a client state. The message to Mogadishu’s elites is clear: either rewrite this deal, or history will.
How Turkey’s Strategy in Africa Capitalizes on Anti-Western and Anti-China Sentiments
Turkey’s High-Tech Aid to Somalia: Akinci Drones Set to Transform Anti-Terror Strategy
Erdogan’s Ottoman Hustle: How Turkey Is Playing Trump to Crush American Business in Africa
Erdogan’s Horn of Africa Power Grab: Is the Turkish Military Winning Somalia’s Capital?
Saudi Arabia’s Billion-Dollar Bid for Eritrea’s Assab Port
Operation Geel Exposes the Truth: International Community’s Reluctance to Embrace Somaliland as a Strategic Ally
Somaliland and UAE Elevate Ties to Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
How Somaliland Could Lead the Global Camel Milk Industry
Iran escalates conflict, attacking Israel; US forces help Israel to intercept Iranian projectiles
From Cell to Summit: The Prisoner Who Became Syria’s President
Gunmen Kill 11 in Southeastern Nigeria Attack, Army Reports
Israel and Iran on Edge: Tensions Escalate Amidst Rising Threats