Somaliland’s Khat epidemic is destroying lives while the elite remain silent

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

The dark reality of Somaliland’s Khat epidemic, where addiction and disease ravage communities while the elite turn a blind eye. Uncover the harsh truths behind the drug trade and discover strategies to combat this destructive force.

In the shadows of Somaliland, a silent epidemic grips the nation, poisoning the minds and bodies of its people. At the heart of this crisis lies Khat, a toxic drug that has permeated every facet of society, leaving devastation in its wake. Yet, as the nation grapples with addiction and disease, the Somaliland elite stand idly by, indifferent to the suffering of their people.

Khat, a stimulant derived from the Catha edulis plant, is chewed for hours on end by millions of Somalilanders, ensnaring them in a cycle of addiction and despair. With each chew, users succumb to its intoxicating effects, numbing their senses and clouding their judgment. For many, Khat is more than just a habit; it’s a way of life, consuming their time, their health, and their finances.

The scale of the problem is staggering, with an estimated 70 percent of Somaliland’s population addicted to Khat. The economic toll is equally alarming, with the drug trade raking in over $6 billion annually, surpassing the nation’s GDP. Yet, despite the clear signs of crisis, the Somaliland elite remain silent, turning a blind eye to the suffering of their people.

While Western countries ban Khat due to its harmful effects, the hypocrisy is glaring as NGOs operating in Somaliland fail to address the issue. These organizations, funded by Western donors, prioritize their own agendas over the well-being of Somalilanders, perpetuating the cycle of addiction and despair.

But the consequences of Khat addiction extend far beyond individual suffering. As cancer rates soar and new diseases emerge, Somaliland faces a public health crisis of unprecedented proportions. The pesticides sprayed on Khat farms, intended to boost production, have instead led to infertility and organ failure among users, exacerbating the nation’s woes.

Yet, amidst the darkness, there is hope. The Quran reminds us that change begins from within, and it is time for the Somaliland elite to heed this call. They must confront the harsh realities of the Khat epidemic and take decisive action to combat its spread.

Education is key to breaking the cycle of addiction, and the elite must lead by example, raising awareness of the dangers of Khat and promoting healthy alternatives. Investment in rehabilitation programs and access to healthcare is essential to supporting those struggling with addiction and rebuilding shattered communities.

But perhaps most importantly, the Somaliland elite must confront their own complicity in the crisis. By turning a blind eye to the suffering of their people, they perpetuate a system of inequality and injustice that threatens to tear the nation apart. It is time for them to stand up and be counted, to acknowledge their responsibility and work towards real, sustainable change.

The path ahead will be difficult, but it is not insurmountable. Together, we can overcome the scourge of Khat addiction and build a brighter future for Somaliland.

The time for action is now.

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

Explore the looming risks to Somaliland’s stability as the nation faces election tensions, with the opposition party Waddani’s refusal to accept anything but victory threatening to upend decades of hard-won peace.

As Somaliland prepares for its upcoming presidential election on November 13, 2024, concerns over potential unrest and instability loom large. The opposition party Waddani has issued a stark warning, asserting that they will only accept the election results if they emerge victorious. Such a stance threatens to plunge Somaliland into a perilous cycle of violence and conflict, putting its hard-won peace and stability at risk.

For the past three decades, Somaliland has been an oasis of calm in a region plagued by turmoil and strife. While neighboring Somalia has grappled with political instability, violence, and insecurity, Somaliland has charted its own path towards peace and development. Its remarkable stability has been the envy of many, attracting attention from international observers and earning praise for its resilience and progress.

However, the upcoming election poses a significant test for Somaliland’s peace and stability. The rhetoric of the opposition party Waddani, with its refusal to accept anything but victory, threatens to undermine the democratic process and sow seeds of discord within the nation. Such a stance is not only irresponsible but also dangerous, as it risks inflaming tensions and sparking violence across the country.

It is essential for all stakeholders in Somaliland to prioritize peace and stability above all else. The forthcoming election should be conducted in a transparent, free, and fair manner, with all parties committed to upholding the integrity of the democratic process. Any attempts to manipulate or undermine the election results must be swiftly condemned and addressed, with perpetrators held accountable for their actions.

The peace that Somaliland has enjoyed for the past three decades is a precious gift that must be cherished and protected at all costs. It is a testament to the resilience and determination of the Somaliland’s people, who have worked tirelessly to build a better future for themselves and future generations. To jeopardize that peace for the sake of political power or personal gain would be a grave disservice to the nation and its people.

As the election draws nearer, it is imperative for all Somalilanders to come together in unity and solidarity, transcending political differences and working towards a shared vision of peace, prosperity, and progress. Only by safeguarding the peace that we have been blessed with can we ensure a brighter future for Somaliland and its people. Let us heed the warning signs and take action to protect our nation’s most precious asset: its peace.

Somaliland’s Election Under Siege: Battling the Menace of Digital Disinformation

President Joe Biden finds himself navigating treacherous political waters as he halts the offensive arms shipment to Israel, a move that has stirred intense debate and raised questions about the administration’s approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

The decision to pause the sale of offensive weapons to Israel comes amid escalating violence in the region, with deadly clashes between Israeli forces and Palestinian militants leading to civilian casualties and widespread destruction. While the move is seen as a gesture of concern for civilian lives and a desire to de-escalate tensions, it has also sparked criticism from some quarters, including lawmakers and advocacy groups who argue that the U.S. should stand firmly behind its ally.

Biden’s delicate balancing act reflects the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, where longstanding alliances, regional dynamics, and domestic political considerations intersect. The decision to withhold offensive arms reflects Biden’s commitment to upholding human rights and promoting peace, but it also risks alienating Israel and its supporters, particularly within the U.S. Congress.

The move has reignited debates over the U.S.’s role as a mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its broader approach to the region. While some applaud Biden’s decision as a step towards accountability and diplomacy, others criticize it as a betrayal of Israel and a capitulation to pressure from progressive groups and international actors.

The timing of the decision is also significant, coming at a time when Biden is facing mounting challenges on the domestic front, including economic concerns, partisan divisions, and legislative hurdles. The administration’s handling of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has become a lightning rod for criticism, with critics accusing Biden of inconsistency and indecision.

The decision to halt the arms shipment underscores the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and the challenges of balancing competing interests and priorities. Biden’s administration must navigate a delicate path forward, seeking to uphold American values, safeguard regional stability, and advance U.S. interests while avoiding actions that could further inflame tensions and exacerbate conflict in the region.

As Biden grapples with the fallout from the decision, he faces pressure from both domestic and international stakeholders to chart a course that promotes peace, respects human rights, and upholds America’s commitments to its allies. The path ahead remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will continue to pose a formidable challenge for U.S. policymakers, testing their resolve, diplomacy, and commitment to peace in the region.

Somaliland defiantly rejects Turkish naval agreement with Somalia, warns of war. Tensions escalate as Ethiopia-supported nation asserts sovereignty.

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

In a realm where geopolitical tensions simmer beneath the surface, the waters of the Horn of Africa have become a battleground for competing interests. At the heart of this intrigue lies Somaliland, a nation fiercely protective of its sovereignty, locked in a struggle against forces seeking to undermine its autonomy.

Recent developments have thrust Somaliland into the spotlight, with the rejection of a naval agreement between Somalia and Turkey serving as the catalyst for heightened tensions. As Somaliland boldly asserts its independence, it stands poised on the brink of conflict, ready to defend its waters against perceived encroachment.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Dr. Isse Keyd Mohamud, delivered a stark warning to the international community, declaring that any Turkish naval approach to Somaliland’s shores would be tantamount to a declaration of war. This uncompromising stance underscores Somaliland’s resolve to safeguard its territorial integrity at all costs.

The rejection of the Turkish naval deal comes amidst the backdrop of a burgeoning partnership between Somaliland and Ethiopia, a strategic alliance that promises full recognition for Somaliland in exchange for the establishment of a naval base on its shores. This landmark agreement has drawn ire from Somalia’s central government, further exacerbating tensions in the region.

As Somalia struggles to maintain control over its territory, Somaliland stands as a beacon of stability and progress in an otherwise tumultuous landscape. Despite facing opposition from Somalia and its allies, including the United States, Turkey, the Arab League, and the European Union, Somaliland remains steadfast in its pursuit of recognition and sovereignty.

The recent statement from the Arab Economic and Cooperation Forum underscores the deepening divide between Somalia and Somaliland, with the former seeking to rally support against the Ethiopia-Somaliland agreement. However, Somaliland remains undeterred, resolute in its quest for international recognition and legitimacy.

Arab Economic and Cooperation Forum

In the face of mounting pressure, Somaliland’s rejection of the Turkish naval agreement serves as a defiant assertion of its independence. As tensions escalate and diplomatic relations strain, the world watches with bated breath, keenly aware of the implications of a potential conflict in the Horn of Africa.

In conclusion, the rejection of the Turkish naval agreement by Somaliland represents a pivotal moment in the nation’s history, as it asserts its sovereignty in the face of external pressures. As the international community grapples with the complexities of the region, Somaliland’s resilience and determination serve as a testament to the enduring spirit of a nation fighting for its rightful place on the world stage.

Exposing Hypocrisy: The West’s Opposition to Somaliland-Ethiopia MoU

Betrayal Exposed: How International Coalition’s Ignorance Fuels Chaos in Somaliland

G7 Aid to Somalia Sparks Controversy Amidst Somaliland Recognition Debate

Border Disputes, Identity Struggles, and the Controversial Narrative of Somalia’s Occupation

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

In the tumultuous landscape of the Horn of Africa, a contentious question echoes loudly: Somalia’s claim over Somaliland. Join us on a journey to uncover the truth behind this long-standing dispute, as we delve into the complexities of border disputes, identity struggles, and the controversial narrative of Somalia’s occupation.

Somaliland, a land that defies misconceptions and exposes the hidden truths buried in history, stands as a testament to resilience and determination. Once a British protectorate, Somaliland gained its sovereignty on June 26th, 1960, marking a proud moment for its people and their newfound nation. The international community wasted no time in recognizing Somaliland’s independence, with over 35 countries, including influential members of the United Nations Security Council, swiftly acknowledging its sovereignty.

However, the story takes a disturbing turn as Somalia attempts to assert itself as the legal successor of Somaliland. Contrary to popular belief, it was Somalia that merged with the already recognized state of Somaliland in 1960, while Somalia itself was under a United Nations trusteeship. Despite legal blunders and failed attempts at union, Somalia continues to perpetuate the false narrative of unity, clinging to the credentials of Somaliland for its own gain.

From 1961 to 1990, Somalia’s occupation of Somaliland has persisted, transforming what was once regarded as a state into a mere territory under its control. Somalia’s claims of secessionist movements in Somaliland are nothing but a facade, masking its own illegitimate occupation and exploitation of Somaliland’s resources.

In contrast, Somaliland stands firm with its legally recognized status and well-documented independence documents. The absence of international re-recognition and the dispute surrounding Somalia’s narrative of secessionists only serve to cover up the reality of Somalia’s illegal occupation.

Despite Somaliland’s rightful claim to sovereignty and its relentless pursuit of recognition, it faces resistance from Somalia, a nation plagued by internal strife and external challenges. Somalia’s lack of internationally demarcated borders and definitive sovereignty guarantee only highlight its own shortcomings in the eyes of the international community.

As the truth behind Somalia’s claim over Somaliland comes to light, it is evident that Somalia’s actions are driven by desperation and deceit. While Somalia clings to its bogus unity, Somaliland remains steadfast in its pursuit of justice and recognition on the world stage.

In conclusion, the international community must acknowledge and address the injustices faced by Somaliland at the hands of Somalia. It is time for Somalia to relinquish its illegal occupation and for Somaliland to reclaim its rightful place among the community of nations. Only then can true peace and prosperity prevail in the Horn of Africa.

Discover the key to changing minds: self-respect. Learn why honoring this fundamental human need is crucial for effective persuasion and dialogue.

In the quest to change minds and foster understanding, one often-overlooked factor is the fundamental need for self-respect. This intrinsic human desire for dignity and validation plays a pivotal role in shaping attitudes and receptiveness to new ideas. Understanding and honoring this need can be the missing ingredient in successful persuasion and dialogue.

At the heart of effective communication lies the recognition of each individual’s inherent worth and value. When engaging in discussions aimed at promoting change, acknowledging and respecting the other person’s sense of self can build trust and openness. By affirming their autonomy and agency, we create a conducive environment for constructive dialogue and meaningful engagement.

Moreover, preserving self-respect is essential for maintaining psychological well-being and resilience. When individuals feel respected and validated, they are more likely to approach challenging conversations with confidence and composure. Conversely, disregard for their dignity can lead to defensiveness, resistance, and polarization, hindering productive discourse.

In the realm of social change and advocacy, appealing to self-respect can be a powerful motivator for action. By framing messages in a way that honors individuals’ identities and values, we tap into their intrinsic drive to uphold their sense of self-worth. This approach fosters a sense of empowerment and ownership, encouraging active participation in efforts to create positive change.

Furthermore, recognizing the importance of self-respect can enhance our own capacity for empathy and understanding. By empathizing with others’ experiences and perspectives, we demonstrate genuine respect for their humanity. This empathetic approach not only strengthens interpersonal connections but also fosters mutual respect and collaboration.

In summary, self-respect serves as a fundamental principle in effective communication and persuasion. By acknowledging and honoring individuals’ dignity, we create an environment conducive to meaningful dialogue and positive change. Incorporating this awareness into our interactions can unlock new pathways for fostering understanding, empathy, and collective action in pursuit of a more equitable and inclusive society.

At the sixth Somalia Quint meeting in London, representatives from various countries reiterated their commitment to supporting Somalia’s security and political stability.

Discover the shocking truth behind international coalition’s blind eye to Somaliland’s stability while propping up chaos in Somalia. It’s time to expose their hypocrisy

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

Exposed: Hypocrisy of Somalia Supporters as Somaliland’s Peace and Democracy Face Neglect

Somaliland, a region in the Horn of Africa, stands as a beacon of stability and democracy in an otherwise tumultuous region. Despite its remarkable achievements in governance, security, and counterterrorism, Somaliland continues to be denied recognition by the international community. While countries like Qatar, Turkey, the UAE, the UK, and the USA pledge continued support for Somalia, they turn a blind eye to Somaliland’s successes and aspirations for recognition. This analysis exposes the hypocrisy of these international coalitions and their detrimental impact on stability in the region.

At the sixth Somalia Quint meeting in London, representatives from various countries reiterated their commitment to supporting Somalia’s security and political stability. Discussions centered on aiding Somalia’s efforts against regional tensions and terrorism, transitioning security responsibilities from the African Union to Somalia, and supporting the Somali government’s Security Sector Development Plan (SSDP). While these discussions are essential for Somalia’s progress, they ignore the achievements and needs of Somaliland.

Somaliland’s track record speaks for itself. Despite minimal international support, it has maintained peace, stability, and democracy within its borders. However, instead of recognizing Somaliland’s accomplishments, these international coalitions persist in bolstering Somalia, a country riddled with internal conflicts, terrorism, and political instability.

The actions of these coalitions have dire consequences for Somaliland. For instance, the conflict in Lascanod, instigated by Somalia soldiers trained by Eritrea and the US, illustrates how international involvement can exacerbate tensions and escalate violence within Somaliland. Successive Somalia presidents have misused international aid by training clan-based militias, diverting resources away from combating terrorism towards personal or tribal conflicts. This misuse of resources has not only failed to address terrorism but has also sown seeds of wider regional instability.

Moreover, the recent Lascanod conflict has plunged the city into chaos, with terrorist groups thriving amidst tribal militias vying for control—a stark departure from its previous stability. The misuse of international aid has also extended to Mogadishu, where forces trained by Turkey, the USA, and others have suppressed political opposition, undermining democratic processes.

The disregard for Somaliland’s stability and democracy is evident in the actions of these international coalitions. While they pledge support for Somalia, they ignore the progress and aspirations of Somaliland. Somaliland does not beg for recognition; it deserves it based on its achievements and commitment to democracy and peace.

In conclusion, the international community’s failure to recognize Somaliland and its continued support for Somalia contribute to instability in the region. It is time for these coalitions to reassess their aid strategies and acknowledge Somaliland’s rightful place among nations. Somaliland’s stability and democracy should be celebrated and supported, not ignored or undermined.

Exposing Hypocrisy: The West’s Opposition to Somaliland-Ethiopia MoU

G7 Aid to Somalia Sparks Controversy Amidst Somaliland Recognition Debate

The Global Chessboard: Can the West and East Checkmate Each Other?

A Tale of Two Somalis: Why the West Invests in Chaos While Ignoring Stability

In his recent article, Rishi Sunak underscores the Conservatives’ purported superiority over Labour, but unwittingly exposes deep-seated divisions within his own party. As the next election approaches, these internal conflicts may pose significant challenges to the Conservatives’ electoral success.

By Kasim Abdulkadir:

Rishi Sunak’s recent article highlights the growing tension within the Conservative Party and sets the stage for a contentious political landscape in the lead-up to the next election. While Sunak portrays the Conservatives as the party with a clear plan for the future, his rhetoric exposes underlying issues and contradictions that may hinder the party’s electoral prospects.

Sunak’s Leadership and Party Division:

Sunak’s return to the political forefront following the election signals a shift in the Conservative Party’s leadership dynamics. As he asserts the party’s superiority over Labour in terms of policy and vision, Sunak inadvertently reveals deep-seated divisions within his own party. The emphasis on decisive action and bold leadership contrasts with reports of internal dissent and ideological conflicts within Conservative ranks.

Everything seems to be going wrong for Rishi Sunak

Economic and Social Policies:

Sunak’s article champions the Conservatives’ economic agenda, including tax cuts and welfare reforms. However, critics argue that these policies disproportionately benefit the wealthy and exacerbate inequality. The government’s handling of the pandemic and its impact on vulnerable communities raise questions about the efficacy and fairness of Conservative economic policies.

Sunak pledges £75 billion defence boost to combat threat from Putin and China

Migration and National Security:

Sunak’s stance on migration and national security reflects broader debates within the Conservative Party regarding immigration and defense. While he touts the government’s efforts to control illegal migration, critics argue that the Rwanda scheme and other punitive measures are inhumane and ineffective. Additionally, Sunak’s emphasis on defense spending and the nuclear deterrent exposes divisions within the party over military priorities and foreign policy objectives.

UK passes controversial bill to send asylum seekers to Rwanda after two years of challenges

Labour’s Response and Electoral Prospects:

Sunak’s critique of Labour‘s lack of plan and vision underscores the Conservatives‘ electoral strategy to capitalize on opposition weaknesses. However, Labour’s ability to exploit Conservative divisions and articulate an alternative vision for the country poses a significant challenge to Sunak and his party. As the next election approaches, the outcome remains uncertain, with both parties vying for voter support amidst ongoing political turmoil and societal challenges.

In conclusion, Rishi Sunak‘s return to the political spotlight heralds a period of heightened tension and uncertainty within the Conservative Party. While he seeks to project strength and unity, underlying divisions and policy contradictions threaten to undermine the party’s electoral prospects. As the Conservatives grapple with internal dissent and external challenges, the road ahead promises to be fraught with obstacles and opportunities for political realignment and change.