Connect with us

Editor's Pick

Europe Faces Reality Check as U.S. Signals Its Withdrawal

Published

on

The Trump administration has made clear that Europe can no longer count on automatic American support against Russian aggression. In just three months, Washington has upended decades of U.S. foreign policy—scaling back its military presence on the continent and pressing for an end to the Ukraine war, even at the cost of Ukrainian territory.

“Europe has been living for 80 years in a situation in which peace was given for granted,” observes Roberto Cingolani, CEO of defense giant Leonardo and former Italian minister. “Now, all of a sudden … we realize that peace must be defended.” Indeed, as Europe braces for a potential Kremlin push, NATO members find themselves in a race against time to rebuild forces hollowed out since the Cold War’s end.

Britain, France and Germany have modestly increased defense budgets after mid-2010s austerity, but experts warn it may take years before new tanks, aircraft and troops reach the front lines. The International Institute for Strategic Studies bluntly concluded last year that Russia’s high casualty rates in Ukraine “painfully highlighted European countries’ current shortcomings.”

Advertisement

Closer to Moscow’s border, Poland has surged ahead—doubling its defense spending and hosting U.S. forces as a bulwark against Russia. Washington praises Warsaw as “the model ally on the continent,” though Warsaw’s motivation stems as much from historical fears of Russian domination as a desire to curry U.S. favor.

The U.S. still maintains roughly 80,000 troops in Europe—more than all but eight European nations—but that force is a fraction of the nearly half-million American servicemembers stationed there at the height of the Cold War. Forward-deployed U.S. bases in Germany, Italy and Poland undergird NATO’s deterrent, while naval and air facilities in Turkey, Greece and Italy project power into the Middle East.

Above all, Europe relies on America’s strategic nuclear arsenal. Britain and France together hold barely one-tenth of Russia’s warheads, but U.S. stockpiles in Europe still roughly match Moscow’s. Those warheads have deterred President Vladimir Putin’s more extreme threats—yet they too now hang in the balance as Washington pivots its focus toward the Indo-Pacific.

Advertisement

Eighty years after D-Day, Europe can no longer assume that U.S. guarantees will hold. Unless NATO capitals dramatically accelerate defense spending, modernize forces and shore up collective resolve, the continent may soon find itself—and its values—on the front line alone.

Editor's Pick

India Prepares to Strike Kashmir – War Drums Along Pakistan Border

Published

on

Modi gives “total operational freedom” to Indian military as terror attack reignites decades-old nuclear powder keg.

The India-Pakistan fuse is lit again—and this time, it’s burning faster than the world can react. With 26 Hindu civilians slaughtered in cold blood during a pilgrimage in Kashmir, India isn’t waiting on diplomacy. It’s mobilizing.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s response wasn’t vague. He told army commanders behind closed doors that they now have “complete operational freedom” to choose targets, timing, and tactics. In plain terms? The green light is on for a crushing Indian military response—and this could be the beginning of the subcontinent’s most dangerous escalation in a generation.

Advertisement

The Indian war machine dwarfs Pakistan’s. Over 1.4 million personnel, nearly 10,000 artillery pieces, 3,740 tanks, two aircraft carriers—and 172 nuclear warheads. When Modi says “We will pursue them to the ends of the Earth,” he means it.

Pakistan, meanwhile, is on high alert. Its army shot down an Indian drone over the disputed Line of Control in Kashmir. Defense Minister Khawaja Asif is openly warning the public of imminent war. Islamabad is bracing for a major strike.

The Indian government blames the Pakistan-backed terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, a UN-listed jihadi outfit with deep ties to Pakistan’s intelligence services. Three suspects are already wanted—two Pakistani nationals and one Indian.

Advertisement

This new flashpoint comes just as the world is already rattled by wars in Gaza, Ukraine, and the Red Sea. But the stakes here are far more apocalyptic. These are nuclear-armed rivals with unfinished business. The 2019 airstrikes, the 1999 Kargil conflict, the blood-soaked insurgency since 1989—all point to one truth: Kashmir remains the world’s most volatile fault line.

And now it’s shifting violently.

China and Saudi Arabia are scrambling to mediate. But Modi isn’t listening to overseas lectures—not this time. The blood on the mountains of Kashmir is fresh, and India believes the time has come for a final reckoning.

Advertisement

This isn’t a war of words. It’s a countdown.

Continue Reading

Editor's Pick

UK Arrests Four Iranian Nationals Over Suspected Terror Plot

Published

on

British security forces arrested four Iranian nationals and one other individual in a sweeping counterterrorism operation aimed at preventing a potentially deadly terrorist act. According to the UK’s Metropolitan Police, the suspects were detained in various locations including London, Manchester, Rochdale, Stockport, and Swindon.

While specific details of the plot remain classified, officials confirmed it involved a targeted attack against a particular premises. The Counter Terrorism Command has since made direct contact with the potential target to ensure safety measures are in place.

Commander Dominic Murphy, head of the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command, emphasized that the investigation is in its early stages, and several lines of inquiry are being pursued to establish motives and assess any further threats. “We understand the public may be concerned,” he said. “We are working closely with the affected site and will continue to provide updates as the investigation develops.”

Advertisement

The arrests come amid heightened concerns over Iranian state-sponsored terrorism across the UK and Europe. MI5 has previously warned of “unprecedented” activity from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which reportedly employs proxies ranging from international drug traffickers to petty criminals to carry out its operations.

In an October 2024 assessment, MI5 Director General Ken McCallum revealed that since January 2022, British authorities had thwarted at least 20 Iranian-backed plots on UK soil. He noted a specific concern about Iranian aggression escalating in the wake of Middle Eastern tensions, particularly targeting British Jewish communities.

The arrested individuals are currently being held under terrorism legislation and are subject to extensive searches across their properties. British authorities, with support from regional police forces, are working urgently to determine whether the suspects had broader ties to Iran’s transnational networks or were operating independently.

Advertisement

The arrests reignite the spotlight on Tehran’s international footprint and its apparent willingness to wage asymmetric warfare far beyond its borders, leveraging criminal elements and ideological sympathizers to destabilize Western democracies.

Security officials continue to urge the public to remain vigilant, noting that while the current threat is being contained, Iran’s evolving strategies pose a serious long-term risk to national security.

This is a developing story.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Editor's Pick

The Day Europe Went Dark: Chaos, Fear, and a New Age of Fragility

Published

on

When the lights went out across Spain and Portugal, chaos followed. It wasn’t just a blackout — it was a warning.

A massive blackout crippled Spain, Portugal, and parts of France, exposing how fragile modern life truly is. Chaos erupted on trains, in metros, in streets — and in hearts.

It began as a flicker.
Then the lights failed.
Then the panic began.

Advertisement

Across Spain, Portugal, and parts of France, a massive, unexpected power outage plunged millions into a medieval nightmare — exposing how fragile modern life truly is.

Trains froze mid-journey.

Metros choked with panicked commuters.

Advertisement

Supermarkets shuttered.

Gas stations went dark.

Phones and ATMs blinked off.

Advertisement

Food supplies and communications collapsed within hours.

It wasn’t just an inconvenience — it was a glimpse into systemic collapse.

Chaos on the Rails

Advertisement

Peter Hughes never expected his journey to Madrid would turn into an endurance test.

Four hours trapped in a dead train.
No power. No working toilets. No way home.

Across the Iberian Peninsula, hundreds of trains froze, leaving thousands stranded — many without ventilation, water, or clear information.

Advertisement

In the countryside, local villagers became heroes, handing out food and water to stunned passengers.

Panic in the Cities

In Madrid, Lisbon, Valencia, and dozens of other cities, traffic lights collapsed into chaos, public transport died, and businesses slammed their doors shut.

Advertisement

With card payments offline, a desperate cash economy reemerged almost instantly.

Hospitals switched to emergency generators.
Airports barely functioned on backup systems.

And with no reliable mobile data, millions were left in the dark — literally and figuratively.

Advertisement

Modern Fragility Exposed

For many, the experience was more than inconvenient — it was terrifying.

“You realize within an hour how much of your survival depends on invisible systems,” said Eloise Edgington, a stranded copywriter in Barcelona.

Advertisement

When power, money, communication, and movement all collapse at once, the modern world reveals itself as frighteningly brittle.

A Warning Shot for Europe

Authorities rushed to contain the damage.
Power companies promised restoration within hours — but it took much longer. Some areas are still struggling.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, questions linger:

How could an entire modern energy grid collapse so easily?

What would happen if next time it wasn’t just accidental — but deliberate?

Advertisement

If a blackout of this scale can occur without warning, what happens in a real cyberwar, sabotage event, or systemic failure?

Today, it was trains, supermarkets, and traffic lights.
Tomorrow — it could be far worse.

The Iberian blackout wasn’t just a one-day crisis.
It was a dress rehearsal for a new age of fragility.

Advertisement

And most were terrifyingly unprepared.

Continue Reading

Editor's Pick

When Love Demands a Bank Account, Not a Heart

Published

on

Financial Abuse Is the New Frontline of Gender War in South Africa.

A doctor.
A marriage.
A Mercedes-Benz.
A silent epidemic exposed.

When Dr. Celiwe Ndaba opened her heart to South Africa, she didn’t just tell her story —
She pulled the mask off a brutal national reality.

Financial abuse is the new frontline of South Africa’s gender war.
And even success, money, and education are no longer shields.

Advertisement

Across TikTok, Instagram, and living rooms, thousands of women — doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs — are confessing the same nightmare:
They loved.
They gave.
They sacrificed.
And they were economically drained — left holding debts, shame, and broken dreams.

“I paid for his car. His business. His image.
He paid me back with betrayal.”

This is not poverty.
This is not “bad luck.”
This is systemic gender warfare, disguised as love.

The Double Bind: “You Must Succeed. You Must Submit.”

South African women face two chains, not one.

Advertisement

At work, they must shine.
At home, they must shrink.

Sociologist Nombulelo Shange calls it “double patriarchy”

“Western pressure to succeed clashes with traditional demands to serve male egos.”

It’s not enough to become a doctor, lawyer, or CEO.
You must also be the good wife, the silent provider, the eternal fixer of broken promises.

Advertisement

You must pay — and smile while doing it.

When Independence Breeds Exploitation

Women are out-earning men more than ever in South Africa.
But success has made them targets.

Cultural expectations still whisper:

Advertisement

“A real man provides. A real woman makes him look like he did.”

That’s why women hand their debit cards to boyfriends at restaurants —
Why they co-sign loans for luxury cars they’ll never drive —
Why they cover rent, groceries, school fees, while their partners “manage their pride.”

Financial control becomes emotional domination.
Economic abuse becomes spiritual warfare.

Love becomes debt bondage.

Advertisement

The True Cost of Silence

For every woman speaking out, hundreds stay silent — trapped by shame, fear, or misguided hope that sacrifice will heal the wound.

By the time the divorce papers come, the credit cards are maxed out, the bank accounts drained, the dreams postponed.

And society still whispers:

Advertisement

“You should have known better.”

No.
We should have built a society where men know better.

A New War Cry for South Africa

Dr. Ndaba’s story is not just about marriage.
It’s about survival.

Women must understand:
Love without respect is a prison.
Affection without financial dignity is a weapon.
Success without protection is vulnerability.

Advertisement

Love should not cost your freedom.

The gender crash has arrived.
South Africa must choose:
Change the culture — or watch it burn.

Success Made Her a Target: How South African Women Are Being Financially Hunted

Advertisement

🔗 Follow waryatv.com for deep-dive exposes on the gender revolution shaking South Africa.

Continue Reading

Editor's Pick

Leaked: How Beijing is Militarizing Africa Behind a Corporate Mask

Published

on

Leaked reports reveal Chinese security companies expanding across Africa unchecked, fueling fears of future proxy wars and growing CCP influence.

From left Somalia Ambassador to China Drs Hodan Osman –

China’s Private Armies Expanding Across Africa Without Control

Africa is under silent siege — not by armies in uniform, but by private Chinese guns operating in the shadows.

A leaked report reveals that Chinese “private security companies” (PSCs) are expanding rapidly across Africa, operating in a dangerous legal gray zone, without international oversight, and with direct ties to Beijing’s military apparatus.

Despite the name, these PSCs are anything but private.

Advertisement

They are packed with ex-PLA and People’s Armed Police operatives — soldiers of the Chinese Communist Party under corporate cover.
Their mission: to protect Beijing’s $50 billion Belt and Road investments and quietly entrench Chinese control without ever raising a national flag.

Between 2007 and 2020, China poured $23 billion into African infrastructure. Now, wherever these projects rise, PSC forces follow — shielding mines, ports, railroads, and political assets with a private army Beijing can deny owning.

Analysts warn the PSCs are fast blurring the line into private military companies (PMCs) — the same kind of shadow forces that destabilized countries like Libya and Sudan.

Advertisement

Already, Chinese contractors have been caught involved in armed operations in Sudan’s civil war zones and South Sudan’s conflict corridors.

Weapons bans under Chinese law are a joke.
The PSCs simply hire local militias, fueling tribal conflicts and corrupting fragile states — a tactic that security experts call “taking sides with guns and money.”

Shootouts involving Chinese security contractors have already erupted in Eastern Somaliland, Kenya, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe — a glimpse into a darker future where Beijing’s shadow armies spark wars it never officially fights.

Advertisement

Human rights abuses, sovereignty violations, and violent incidents are now ticking time bombs across the continent.

As China’s hidden legions grow, Africa faces a chilling question:

Who really controls the land, the roads, the resources — and the guns?

Advertisement

Somalia Ambassador to China Drs Hodan Osman

Continue Reading

Editor's Pick

New poll finds 72% of American Jews disapprove of Trump’s presidency

Published

on

Trump’s Approval Craters Among American Jews Despite Hardline Antisemitism Push.  Orthodox Jews remain a key base of support. 

Donald Trump may champion himself as the strongest defender of Jewish interests in U.S. politics, but American Jews aren’t buying it. A damning new survey reveals that a whopping 72% of Jewish voters disapprove of his presidency, including 67% who strongly disapprove. And while Trump has made headlines cracking down on antisemitism, 56% of Jewish voters say his policies miss the mark.

The Jewish Electorate Institute’s poll, conducted by the Mellman Group, lays bare a deeper reality: American Jews — except for a vocal Orthodox minority — overwhelmingly distrust Trump’s motives and methods. The Orthodox community, representing about 10% of respondents, offered a stark contrast: over 70% support Trump, seeing his actions as pro-Israel and tough on antisemitism.

Advertisement

But Reform, Conservative, and unaffiliated Jews — the vast majority — are unimpressed. From freezing university funds to deporting foreign student activists, Trump’s “war on antisemitism” is seen by many as a political weapon rather than a genuine stand against hate.

His authoritarian leanings haven’t helped. More than 70% of American Jews oppose his controversial executive orders allowing deportations without court hearings, and most reject his sweeping tariffs and attacks on government institutions. The numbers suggest a Jewish electorate deeply alarmed not only by Trump’s rhetoric but by his policies across the board.

Notably absent from the poll were questions about Trump’s Middle East maneuverings — including his aggressive stance on Iran and radical proposals for Gaza. That silence may have spared him even lower marks, especially among younger Jews who disapprove of his handling of antisemitism by more than 50%.

Advertisement

In 2025, Trump faces a sobering reality: while Orthodox Jews remain his loyal base, he has alienated most of the broader Jewish community. His strategy may win applause in right-wing circles, but the numbers make clear — it’s not winning Jewish hearts.

Continue Reading

Editor's Pick

Turkey’s Somali Oil Grab: A Strategic Coup or Neocolonial Exploitation?

Published

on

Ankara secures 90% of Somalia’s oil and gas profits in landmark deal, sparking fears of energy colonialism under the guise of partnership.
Turkey’s new hydrocarbons deal with Somalia grants it 90% of all oil and gas output with zero upfront costs, raising questions about sovereignty, exploitation, and geopolitical consequences in the Horn of Africa.

Turkey didn’t just strike oil in Somalia — it struck gold. In a sweeping hydrocarbons agreement now before the Turkish Parliament, Ankara has secured 90% of Somalia’s oil and gas output, full export rights, zero upfront costs, and even the legal turf of arbitration on its own soil. Welcome to the 21st-century blueprint of “soft conquest” — wrapped in partnership, sealed with military escorts.

Somalia, teetering between internal fragility and global neglect, has offered up its vast offshore reserves to Turkey on terms that defy global industry norms. No signature bonuses. No surface fees. Only 5% royalties capped for Somalia, and Turkish corporations get to walk away with the lion’s share — free to export, sell, and profit without local interference.

Advertisement

This isn’t partnership. It’s a power grab masquerading as cooperation.

Text of the hydrocarbon agreement between Turkey and Somalia.

Worse still, Turkey can assign its rights to any foreign third party without even opening a local office — a clause that opens the door for opaque subcontracts and external interference in Somalia’s maritime zones. Turkish warships, under the pretext of anti-piracy missions, will escort deep-sea drill ships come September. But what they’re really guarding is Ankara’s geopolitical gamble — a stranglehold on East Africa’s most lucrative energy basin.

The optics are troubling. Somalia’s government, seeking legitimacy and allies, is locking itself into a long-term dependency that gives away critical sovereignty in exchange for vague promises of training and defense aid. If oil is supposed to be Somalia’s path to self-reliance, this deal builds a highway — but Turkey is behind the wheel.

As the global energy chessboard tilts eastward, Somalia risks being reduced to a pawn — or worse, a client state. The message to Mogadishu’s elites is clear: either rewrite this deal, or history will.

Advertisement

How Turkey’s Strategy in Africa Capitalizes on Anti-Western and Anti-China Sentiments

Favori’s Controversial Mogadishu Airport Deal: Allegations of Corruption, Exploitation, and Political Influence

Turkey’s High-Tech Aid to Somalia: Akinci Drones Set to Transform Anti-Terror Strategy

Advertisement

Erdogan’s Ottoman Hustle: How Turkey Is Playing Trump to Crush American Business in Africa

Erdogan’s Horn of Africa Power Grab: Is the Turkish Military Winning Somalia’s Capital?

Turkish Troops in Mogadishu: A War Cloaked in Denial

Advertisement

The Hidden Motives Behind Turkey’s Actions in Somaliland

Continue Reading

Editor's Pick

Police Bullet, System Failure: The Killing of Abdifatah Ahmed in Melbourne

Published

on

A Somali refugee is gunned down in broad daylight—and Australia’s justice system may never answer why. The fatal police shooting of a Somali refugee in Melbourne has ignited protests and exposed deep failures in Australia’s treatment of refugees, race, and mental health. 

Footscray protesters held signs with Mr Ahmed’s face on them that read ‘Abdifatah needed support, not bullets’ after police shot dead 35-year-old Abdifatah Ahmed. Picture: Jake Nowakowski / NewsWire

Abdifatah Ahmed did not need a bullet. He needed help. He needed a system that could see his pain and respond with dignity. Instead, he was killed—shot dead by police on the streets of Melbourne in what is quickly becoming a symbol of everything broken in Australia’s treatment of African refugees and people suffering mental health crises.

Victoria Police claim their officers had “seconds to act” when Ahmed, reportedly armed with a knife, failed to comply. But witnesses and community leaders are asking a different question: Why was lethal force the only option? Why, in one of Australia’s most policed cities, was this man met with guns and not compassion?

This isn’t an isolated tragedy—it’s a pattern. Ahmed was a Somali refugee, known to be homeless, struggling with mental illness, and failed by every system meant to protect him. When the call came in, two officers arrived without Tasers. They responded with bullets.

Advertisement

Victoria Police has been forced to defend two officers against allegations of racial profiling as hundreds of protesters gather at the scene of a fatal police shooting in Footscray, protesting the death of Somali refugee Abdifatah Ahmed. Picture: Jake Nowakowski / NewsWire

To the Somali and African communities of Melbourne, this wasn’t just another incident—it was the final, unbearable insult. Hundreds took to the streets chanting “Mental Health Needs Care, Not Bullets.” Some clashed with police. Others lit candles. All of them demanded accountability.

Ahmed’s death has shredded what little trust remained. It has exposed a policing culture where racialized trauma meets a trigger finger—and where leadership too often doubles down rather than listens. The official response? “We reject any claims that this was racially motivated.” That’s it.

Meanwhile, the City of Maribyrnong says it supports an “independent review.” Too little, too late.

This shooting happened days after police rolled out “increased patrols” in the area to “tackle antisocial behaviour.” For many, that announcement felt like a threat, not protection. And now a young man is dead.

Advertisement

Australia says it’s a country of fairness and opportunity. Abdifatah Ahmed came seeking exactly that. He died as yet another victim of a system that saw his skin color before his humanity.

When the state is the aggressor, justice cannot wait. Demand answers. Demand change.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Most Viewed

error: Content is protected !!