The latest warning from U.S. officials, highlighting the activities of Iranian hackers linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), underscores the growing cyber threat landscape as the U.S. moves closer to its November elections. The FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) have sounded the alarm, urging political campaigns, as well as individuals connected to U.S. politics, to enhance their cybersecurity defenses. This coordinated effort follows increasing evidence that Iranian hackers are targeting political entities, hoping to undermine the integrity and confidence in the electoral process.

This isn’t the first time Iranian operatives have been accused of meddling in U.S. elections. The latest bulletin from the FBI and CISA points to a continuation of efforts to compromise personal and professional email accounts, often through sophisticated phishing attacks. The hackers, according to U.S. officials, impersonate trusted contacts to steal login credentials and passwords. These methods are part of a broader strategy, used in the past, to conduct hack-and-leak operations aimed at discrediting political campaigns.

Late last month, the U.S. Department of Justice formally charged three Iranian nationals—Masoud Jalili, Seyyed Ali Aghamiri, and Yaser Balaghi—for their roles in previous cyber campaigns that targeted high-ranking U.S. officials, including former CIA officers. These efforts, according to U.S. prosecutors, are seen as part of a broader attempt by Tehran to disrupt American democratic processes and weaken political stability.

What’s particularly troubling about these warnings is the potential for long-term damage to public confidence. While direct electoral manipulation, such as altering vote counts, has not been reported, the aim of such cyberattacks seems to be more about sowing distrust and amplifying societal divisions. The use of AI-generated fake news, social media disinformation, and other cyber tools to manipulate public sentiment is part of this tactic. The goal: to stoke internal political discord and erode trust in democratic institutions.

Previous U.S. intelligence reports have suggested that Iran’s interference efforts are aligned with a desire to harm Donald Trump’s re-election chances, while indirectly boosting other candidates. While Iran denies these claims, U.S. officials, including Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, have provided detailed assessments indicating that Tehran has also tried to infiltrate protest movements, most notably those opposing Israeli actions in Gaza.

Jen Easterly, the CISA Director, emphasized that the IRGC’s cyber capabilities continue to pose a serious and escalating risk. U.S. adversaries, including Iran, Russia, and China, have reportedly ramped up cyber activities targeting not only political campaigns but also the broader political ecosystem. This includes journalists, academics, former officials, and activists—individuals whose influence or credibility could be leveraged to affect election outcomes.

As the November 5 election nears, the stakes grow higher. Political campaigns, especially those at the national level, have become prime targets for cyberattacks. The FBI and CISA have responded by tripling the number of security briefings for political campaigns, a move aimed at mitigating the risks of foreign interference. Yet, the resilience of U.S. democracy may ultimately hinge on how well these threats are countered—not just technologically but also in terms of public perception.

For Iran, meddling in U.S. elections appears to be part of a broader geopolitical strategy. As tensions between Washington and Tehran persist, especially over issues like Iran’s nuclear program and its regional influence, cyber warfare has become a powerful tool. The fact that Iranian hackers are now being openly tied to efforts to influence U.S. elections reflects a new, digital front in the ongoing geopolitical struggle.

Whether the latest round of cyberattacks will have any substantial impact remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that foreign cyber interference is now an integral part of the modern electoral landscape, raising urgent questions about how governments, political organizations, and voters can safeguard democracy in the digital age. The challenge for U.S. authorities, then, is not only in defending against these incursions but also in maintaining public trust—no easy task in an environment rife with disinformation and political polarization.

The U.S. response to these threats—whether through enhanced cybersecurity measures, political resilience, or legal actions against foreign actors—will be critical in the months ahead. The integrity of the electoral process and the ability of democratic institutions to withstand foreign interference remain at the heart of these efforts. As Iranian hackers continue to prowl, the call for vigilance has never been louder.

As Somaliland prepares for its upcoming election, the political landscape is being shaped in unexpected ways. The once-traditional campaign strategies involving door-to-door outreach, rallies, and state-run media have taken a back seat. In their place? A flood of TikTok influencers, content creators, and mid-tier social media stars, who are quickly becoming the primary sources of political information for a significant chunk of the electorate. But what might seem like a digital revolution of democratic engagement carries a dark side—one that raises serious concerns about the integrity of Somaliland’s elections and the potential manipulation of public opinion.

The shift is clear in the numbers. According to the latest research from Waryatv’s Research Team, an analysis of 7,946 unique TikTok accounts between August and September 2024 found that mid-tier influencers or creators dominate the platform, accounting for 46% of the accounts followed by Somaliland adults. Smaller accounts—often friends, family, or hyper-local content creators—are followed by 38% of users. Notably, only a minuscule 0.4% of users follow actual journalists or media outlets, with politicians trailing behind at less than 1%. This reveals a startling disconnect between the electorate and traditional, verified news sources. More significantly, it exposes the country to a flood of misinformation and manipulation that could dangerously distort the democratic process.

Somaliland now finds itself in the grips of an unsettling trend. Political parties, most notably the opposition Waddani Party, have pivoted to social media platforms like TikTok as a primary vehicle for disseminating campaign messages. While the ruling party Kulmiye continues to rely on traditional journalism and state media such as Radio Hargeisa and Somaliland TV (SLTV), it’s clear that they are playing catch-up in the TikTok-driven world of political influence. This transition to digital campaigning may seem modern and even progressive, but the risks are profound.

For one, the personalized nature of TikTok’s algorithm makes it a breeding ground for misinformation. Unlike platforms like Facebook or Twitter, where users have more direct control over their news consumption, TikTok’s algorithm serves users a constant stream of content that aligns with their interests and viewing habits. What this means in the context of an election is that a user who enjoys a certain type of content—whether entertainment, gossip, or conspiracy theories—may be exposed to political content that shares the same unverified, sensationalized tone. In this case, the facts are drowned out by the noise, and misinformation campaigns can spread like wildfire.

There is a growing concern that these TikTok influencers, who are now shaping political narratives for nearly half of Somaliland’s online users, do not adhere to any journalistic ethics. They aren’t bound by the responsibility to fact-check or present balanced viewpoints. Their content is often mixed with election campaign songs, gossip, or sensationalized promotional material, making it difficult for users to discern where entertainment ends and political reality begins. This merging of content is not merely a quirk of the platform but a deliberate strategy employed by parties like Waddani to blur the lines between news and entertainment, hoping to capture the attention of Somaliland’s youth—the very group that constitutes a significant part of the electorate.

And the numbers don’t lie. An astonishing 52% of TikTok users in Somaliland regularly get their news from the platform, up from 22% in 2020. This rise in TikTok as a news source coincides with a troubling decline in trust in legacy media. While journalists and traditional news organizations are followed by less than 1% of users on the platform, creators—who often lack any formal training or expertise—are now viewed as legitimate purveyors of political information. This trend is particularly prevalent among the youth, with 40% of Somalilander users aged 18-24 discovering political news on TikTok.

The implications are staggering. Without any rule of law regulating social media platforms like TikTok in Somaliland, the country is ripe for election manipulation. Misinformation campaigns can be launched without repercussions, and the lack of oversight means that foreign actors or political operatives can exploit these platforms to sway public opinion. The absence of accountability for the content posted on TikTok raises serious red flags about the fairness and transparency of the upcoming election.

The potential for TikTok to be weaponized during Somaliland’s election is very real, and if left unchecked, it could undermine the democratic process in profound ways. While social media has been celebrated for democratizing information, in places like Somaliland, where regulation is virtually nonexistent, it poses an unprecedented threat.

As the election heats up, the role of TikTok in shaping the political conversation will only grow. But the question remains: will this influence be a force for democratic engagement, or will it serve as a tool for manipulation and control?

As Somaliland faces its 2024 elections, the unchecked power of TikTok could distort the political landscape and erode trust in the democratic process. With no regulatory framework in place to monitor social media content, the country risks falling victim to a flood of misinformation, manipulation, and influence from unregulated content creators.

The rise of TikTok in Somaliland politics is both a symptom of changing media consumption and a warning sign of potential democratic backsliding.

As the United States approaches its next major election in November 2024, the political landscape is charged with anticipation. The upcoming elections, which will determine the next president, members of Congress, and several state and local officials, are set against a backdrop of intense political polarization, economic challenges, and social upheavals. This analysis will explore key factors shaping the election, major candidates, voter issues, and the potential outcomes.

The 2024 U.S. presidential election is poised to be one of the most watched events globally. On the Republican side, former President Donald Trump is running for office again, having secured a substantial base within the GOP. Despite facing multiple legal challenges, including indictments and civil suits, Trump continues to lead in most Republican primary polls. His “America First” agenda resonates with a large segment of the party, emphasizing nationalism, strict immigration policies, and deregulation.

On the Democratic side, President Joe Biden has confirmed his intention to run for a second term, despite concerns over his age (he would be 82 at the start of a second term). Biden’s platform focuses on economic recovery, climate change, healthcare, and rebuilding international alliances. His administration’s accomplishments, such as the Inflation Reduction Act and the infrastructure bill, will likely be central to his campaign, though criticism over inflation and immigration may challenge his appeal.

In addition to Trump and Biden, a few other notable candidates have emerged. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. briefly drew attention with his campaign as a Democrat before switching to run as an independent, presenting a potential challenge to both parties by attracting voters dissatisfied with the mainstream options. Moreover, progressive Democrats may look toward figures like California Governor Gavin Newsom, should Biden face any last-minute health or political obstacles.

Several issues are likely to dominate the discourse leading up to the 2024 elections. Understanding these issues is crucial for analyzing the political environment:

Voters are likely to focus heavily on the economy, particularly inflation, wage stagnation, and the broader cost of living crisis. The U.S. experienced historic inflation levels during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and while inflation has cooled in recent months, many Americans still feel the squeeze of rising prices, especially in housing, healthcare, and energy. The candidates’ positions on economic relief, tax policy, and job creation will be pivotal to their success.

Cultural and social issues, such as abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and gun control, remain deeply divisive. The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade ignited a wave of activism on both sides of the abortion debate, and many states have since passed restrictive or protective laws regarding abortion access. Both parties will likely mobilize their bases around these issues, with Democrats emphasizing personal freedoms and reproductive rights, while Republicans highlight their traditional, conservative values.

Climate change is another significant issue, particularly among younger voters. President Biden’s efforts to transition the U.S. toward renewable energy and reduce carbon emissions are likely to be central to his campaign. However, Republicans have criticized Biden’s climate policies, arguing that they hurt U.S. energy independence and impose unnecessary regulations on businesses. The ongoing debate between environmental sustainability and economic growth will be a critical battleground.

Immigration continues to be a contentious issue, especially along the southern border. Republicans are likely to campaign on tougher immigration enforcement and border security, criticizing the Biden administration’s handling of the situation. Democrats, meanwhile, are advocating for comprehensive immigration reform, focusing on a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and addressing root causes of migration in Latin America.

As in previous elections, the outcome of the 2024 presidential race will likely hinge on key battleground states such as Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, and Georgia. These swing states have fluctuated between Democratic and Republican control in recent election cycles and are expected to be intensely competitive once again. Suburban voters, in particular, will be a crucial demographic, as their preferences often tip the balance in these closely contested states.

Voter turnout will be another determining factor in 2024. Both parties are expected to engage in extensive get-out-the-vote campaigns, particularly targeting minority groups, young voters, and women, who could play a decisive role in the election outcome. However, increasing political polarization may also lead to lower voter engagement among moderate voters or those disillusioned by the extreme rhetoric on both sides.

In addition to the presidency, all 435 seats in the House of Representatives and 33 Senate seats will be up for grabs in 2024. Republicans are aiming to maintain control of the House, while Democrats hope to retain their narrow Senate majority. The balance of power in Congress will significantly impact the next president’s ability to enact their legislative agenda.

The 2024 U.S. elections represent a critical juncture in American politics, with significant implications for the country’s future direction on both domestic and international issues. With a polarized electorate, key battleground states, and a complex array of voter concerns, the election will likely be fiercely contested. As the campaigns intensify, the candidates’ ability to address pressing issues such as the economy, social justice, climate change, and immigration will shape not only their political fortunes but also the nation’s trajectory for years to come.

With less than a month before U.S. voters head to the polls, intelligence officials are sounding alarms about an intensifying wave of disinformation efforts from adversarial nations. According to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, countries like Russia, Iran, and China are increasing their efforts to influence the upcoming presidential election and undermine public confidence in the process.

A senior intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, emphasized that foreign actors are accelerating these campaigns as Election Day nears, recognizing the vulnerability of early voters and the potential to exacerbate post-election uncertainty.

“They understand the stakes,” the official said, adding that disinformation could continue to spread even after polls close, particularly to challenge the validity of election results.

While Moscow remains focused on boosting former President Donald Trump’s chances, Iran has reportedly been working against the Republican nominee by aiding operations harmful to his campaign. China, though less involved in the presidential race, has concentrated its influence on state and local elections, targeting candidates perceived as threats to its geopolitical interests, notably those with strong pro-Taiwan stances.

Despite Beijing’s denials, U.S. officials are also seeing signs of Cuban involvement, as well as renewed Russian efforts targeting congressional races, particularly to undermine U.S. support for Ukraine.

These warnings align with growing concerns among lawmakers and cybersecurity experts, who have repeatedly cautioned that foreign meddling in U.S. elections has become more sophisticated. Microsoft President Brad Smith has noted a sharp rise in malign cyber efforts, particularly by Russia and Iran.

Moreover, foreign actors are increasingly disguising their hand by using American intermediaries to spread their messages, a tactic that makes their efforts harder to detect.

As voters prepare to cast their ballots, experts worry the 48 hours following Election Day may be especially vulnerable to disinformation, with foreign adversaries poised to exploit even the slightest delay or dispute over results.

As Tunisians vote, concerns grow over deepening authoritarianism, economic woes, and the absence of real alternatives to President Saied.

As Tunisians head to the polls, the country’s democracy teeters on the edge. Incumbent President Kais Saied is set for reelection, unopposed by major rivals who remain behind bars. Saied’s sweeping power grab since 2021, which led to a rewritten constitution and the jailing of political opponents, has triggered domestic and international concern. Critics fear a new term could exacerbate Tunisia’s ongoing economic crisis and solidify the nation’s authoritarian drift. With no viable alternative, Tunisians cast their votes under the shadow of uncertainty.

Voter turnout, while bolstered by Saied’s supporters, remains clouded by fears of electoral manipulation and growing dissatisfaction. Many protestors label Saied a “Pharaoh,” accusing him of manipulating laws and eroding freedoms. Despite this, Saied continues to enjoy significant backing from Tunisia’s working class, positioning himself as a bulwark against foreign interference and internal corruption.

Opponents like Rached Ghannouchi, leader of the Ennahdha party, and Abir Moussi of the Free Destourian Party, remain incarcerated, eliminating much of the competition. Furthermore, with ISIE barring several candidates from standing, including one who now faces over 14 years in prison, the election has been criticized for lacking genuine competition.

For many Tunisians, the stakes are high. The country’s economic crisis deepens as inflation rises, and the unemployment rate continues to soar. While Saied’s authoritarian tactics raise alarms, his supporters argue that his consolidation of power is necessary to stabilize Tunisia amid this turmoil. Whether Saied’s promised “reconstruction” will materialize—or if Tunisia’s democratic experiment will unravel further—remains to be seen as the nation awaits the results of this pivotal election.

The final outcome could redefine Tunisia’s political trajectory, but the shadow of authoritarianism looms large over this crucial moment.

Accusations of media manipulation ignite tensions between Somalia’s federal government and Jubbaland President Ahmed Madobe.

The Somali presidency is under fire for allegedly funding a propaganda campaign against Jubaland’s President, Ahmed Madobe, as political tensions escalate. Mohamed Hassan Hiis, Jubaland’s Director of Information, claimed that Somalia’s federal office has been paying to spread insults and misinformation about Madobe. This accusation comes amid a deepening rift over the upcoming election processes. While Somalia’s federal government pushes for unified national elections, Madobe insists on an independent vote, fueling conflict between the two sides. Efforts to mediate have thus far failed, heightening political uncertainty.

This bitter dispute reflects broader divisions between the federal government and regional leaders, with the future of Somalia’s electoral system hanging in the balance. Madobe’s insistence on separate elections, reminiscent of the 2019 Jubaland elections, stands in sharp contrast to Villa Somalia’s vision of a unified electoral body. As the rift widens, the likelihood of reaching an agreement fades, threatening any potential for political cohesion.

Both President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud and Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre have made unsuccessful attempts to convince Madobe to accept a unified election process. These efforts reflect a broader federal ambition to centralize governance, which Madobe and other regional leaders perceive as an erosion of local autonomy.

At the heart of this controversy is a power struggle that goes beyond election logistics—it’s about control over Somalia’s political future. While federal authorities see a unified electoral system as a step towards a stable and cohesive government, Madobe views it as an encroachment on Jubaland’s hard-earned autonomy. The deepening political divide between Mogadishu and Kismayo underscores the broader challenges Somalia faces in balancing federal and regional interests.

How President Hassan’s Corruption Crushing Somalia’s Federal States

Flint meeting reveals growing discontent as Arab American voters split between Harris and Trump.

Vice President Kamala Harris’s recent meeting with Arab American leaders in Flint, Michigan, revealed deep frustrations within the community over the administration’s handling of the Gaza and Lebanon conflicts. The Arab American Institute poll shows the community’s support for Harris is now almost evenly split with former President Donald Trump, signaling a dramatic shift in their traditionally Democratic voting patterns.

While Harris expressed concern over civilian casualties and emphasized diplomatic solutions, she faces criticism for the administration’s unwavering support of Israel’s military actions. The exclusion of certain pro-Palestinian groups from the meeting only deepened the sense of disillusionment, particularly as groups like the Uncommitted National Movement push back on her re-election bid.

Michigan, home to nearly 400,000 Arab Americans, has become a critical battleground. Many see Harris’s meeting as an attempt to contain the growing dissatisfaction within a voter base whose concerns about U.S. involvement in the Middle East are more intense than ever. As humanitarian crises unfold, and civilian deaths continue to mount in both Gaza and Lebanon, Harris’s assurances fell short for those advocating a complete ceasefire.

Arab American frustrations stem from the administration’s continued military aid to Israel. This policy, according to activists like Layla Elabed of the Uncommitted National Movement, contradicts the calls for peace and fuels the devastation witnessed daily. The sense of betrayal is palpable, especially for families directly impacted, such as those with loved ones killed or displaced in the ongoing violence.

Pro-Palestinian groups, including Abandon Harris, remain resolute in their refusal to engage with the administration. Their stance is clear: without a substantial shift in U.S. policy toward Israel and Palestine, they’ll actively oppose the Democratic ticket in Michigan and other key states.

The erosion of Democratic support is stark. A recent poll by the Arab American Institute revealed a near tie between Trump and Harris among Arab American voters, a community that once overwhelmingly backed Democratic candidates. Trump’s outreach, paired with endorsements from local Muslim leaders like Amer Ghalib, Hamtramck’s Yemeni American mayor, highlights the growing appeal of the Republican camp.

For Harris and her campaign, the stakes couldn’t be higher. The administration’s policies on the Middle East, particularly regarding Gaza and Lebanon, have alienated many voters who feel their concerns are being sidelined. The road to winning back their trust is narrowing, and as the election looms, the future of Arab American support remains uncertain.

Authorities in Islamabad on Friday enacted stringent security measures, including road blockades, suspension of cell services, and school closures, to prevent supporters of jailed former Prime Minister Imran Khan from marching on the capital. The rally, called by Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, was planned to protest alleged electoral fraud and controversial constitutional amendments proposed by the ruling coalition led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.

Security forces, bolstered by paramilitary units, sealed off major entry points into Islamabad and its twin city Rawalpindi, home to Pakistan’s military headquarters. The government also banned public gatherings, citing the need for heightened security ahead of diplomatic meetings, including an upcoming visit by Chinese Prime Minister Li Qiang.

Khan, incarcerated since August on contentious corruption charges, urged his supporters to gather at D-Chowk, a central square near parliament, to peacefully challenge what he describes as a rigged electoral process and an illegitimate government. His arrest has only deepened the rift between Khan’s populist movement and the military-backed government, which has faced mounting criticism for its crackdown on dissent.

On the ground, tensions flared as police arrested dozens of PTI activists, including two of Khan’s sisters, Aleema Khan and Uzma Khanum, and used tear gas to disperse demonstrators. Thousands of supporters from PTI-governed Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, led by the provincial chief minister, marched toward the capital despite these efforts to block their access.

Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, condemned the government’s response. The watchdog decried the shutdown of communication networks and roadblocks, calling them an infringement on the public’s right to peaceful assembly and free expression. Amnesty urged Pakistan to honor its international obligations and refrain from employing “unlawful force” against the demonstrators.

Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi defended the heavy-handed measures, emphasizing the need to maintain order ahead of crucial diplomatic engagements, including the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit scheduled for mid-October. He warned PTI against proceeding with the protest, stating, “Anyone caught will not be shown any leniency.”

The political turmoil has been exacerbated by Khan’s ousting in 2022 through a parliamentary no-confidence vote, which he claims was orchestrated by the military—an assertion Sharif and the military deny. Despite being under constant pressure, Khan’s PTI won the largest share of seats in February’s general election but fell short of securing a parliamentary majority, allowing the ruling coalition to remain in power. Khan’s enduring popularity has kept him at the center of Pakistan’s volatile political landscape, even as the government continues to tighten its grip on opposition activities.

The ongoing confrontation underscores the deepening fissures within Pakistan’s democracy, where the military’s influence and a polarized political environment complicate prospects for stability. As both sides dig in, the question remains whether this political impasse can be resolved through dialogue—or if the nation will see further unrest.