While Russian state media appears to lavish attention on Donald Trump in its coverage of the upcoming U.S. election, official Kremlin sentiment remains far more ambivalent. Despite the flattery directed at Trump and disdain for Democratic candidate Kamala Harris, the Kremlin itself maintains a strategic distance, aware of the complexities that both candidates bring to U.S.-Russia relations.

Russian state TV, particularly Channel One, has aired multiple segments portraying Trump and his running mate JD Vance favorably, juxtaposing them with critiques of Harris. Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson’s criticisms of Harris have been featured, as well as compilations of her more awkward public moments, emphasizing her tendency to laugh during speeches—a trait Russian President Vladimir Putin has sarcastically referenced. By contrast, Trump is depicted as a leader of common sense, though embattled by what the state broadcaster claims are “sinister forces,” including alleged assassination plots.

Despite this media favoritism, the Kremlin remains publicly noncommittal. Officially, Moscow has stated that it will work with whoever is elected president, dismissing suggestions that it has a preferred candidate. Nonetheless, former employees of Russian state media have pointed to regular Kremlin-guided meetings, hinting that the favorable coverage of Trump may be part of a broader strategy, one in line with Russia’s geopolitical interests.

Trump’s historically warmer rhetoric toward Putin and his less vocal support for Ukraine during its war with Russia have sparked concern in Kyiv. Ukrainian officials fear that Trump’s return to the White House could diminish their crucial alliance with the U.S., which has been instrumental in their defense against Russian aggression. Trump has even gone as far as blaming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for contributing to the outbreak of the war. Yet, Trump has also hinted at a continued line of communication with Putin since leaving office, saying only that “if I did, it’s a smart thing.” In contrast, Harris has consistently labeled Putin a “murderous dictator,” vowing to continue supporting Ukraine and condemning the alleged assassination of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, which the Kremlin denies.

Russian state media pundits often express support for Trump, but for differing reasons. Andrei Sidorov, a senior academic at Moscow State University, recently argued that Trump’s divisive politics could lead to the destabilization of the United States, a long-held aspiration of some Russian nationalists. Sidorov suggested that a Trump victory could trigger infighting within the U.S., potentially leading to the fragmentation of the country—a scenario that some in Russia would welcome.

However, not everyone within Russia’s political elite shares the enthusiasm for Trump. Despite Trump’s reputation for warmer relations with Putin, his time in office from 2017 to 2021 saw continued sanctions against Russia, leading many in Moscow to question whether a second Trump presidency would truly improve bilateral relations. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, recalling his interactions with Trump, remarked that although Trump was personally friendly, his administration still imposed regular sanctions on Russia. “We concluded that we need to rely on ourselves,” Lavrov said, underscoring Moscow’s recognition that it cannot depend on U.S. leadership—regardless of who is in office.

Other senior Russian sources have echoed this skepticism. While some hold out hope that Trump’s reluctance to finance Ukraine’s war effort could lead to a diplomatic breakthrough, others remain doubtful. One anonymous source noted that Trump’s presidency might not deliver on his rhetoric, pointing to how U.S.-Russia relations deteriorated even under his administration. The same source highlighted Trump’s unpredictability, particularly concerning China, Russia’s key ally, as a cause for concern.

Another high-ranking source confirmed that Moscow does not expect any significant shift in relations, regardless of the election outcome. Neither Trump nor Harris, the source said, is likely to pursue a policy of friendship with Russia. The West’s deeply entrenched view of Russia as a geopolitical adversary, the source argued, remains a constant, one that no U.S. leader is likely to challenge.

In the end, Moscow’s position is pragmatic. While Trump may enjoy favorable coverage in state media, the Kremlin harbors no illusions about the complexities of U.S.-Russia relations. Both candidates bring their own challenges, and Russia’s leadership is preparing for a continuation of strained ties, whoever emerges victorious in the U.S. election.

Indonesia is set to enter a new political chapter as Prabowo Subianto, a former special forces commander, assumes the presidency on Sunday, marking a significant shift in leadership for the world’s third-largest democracy. Prabowo, who won the February 14 election with nearly 60% of the vote, will succeed President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo, a leader credited with ushering in a period of strong economic growth and extensive infrastructure development during his two terms in office.

The 73-year-old Prabowo, running alongside Gibran Rakabuming Raka, Jokowi’s eldest son, as vice president, has spent the past months consolidating political support by building a broad parliamentary coalition. This development has secured his position as Indonesia’s eighth president, after two unsuccessful bids for the presidency in previous years. The swearing-in ceremony will take place in Indonesia’s parliament, followed by a procession through Jakarta’s streets lined with supporters, marking both a transition of power and a symbolic continuation of Jokowi’s policies.

Prabowo campaigned as the “continuity candidate,” pledging to maintain and build upon Jokowi’s economic achievements. He has ambitious plans to accelerate economic growth from the current rate of 5% to 8%, aiming for Indonesia to become self-sufficient in food production and to take on a more assertive role on the global stage. His presidency is anticipated to be one of economic focus, aligning with investor hopes for stability and progress in Southeast Asia’s largest economy.

Despite this, Prabowo’s rise to the presidency is not without controversy. His military past, including allegations of human rights abuses during the late 1990s in East Timor and Papua, as well as accusations of involvement in the kidnapping of student activists during Indonesia’s turbulent democratic transition, have raised concerns among human rights advocates. These charges contributed to his dismissal from the military in 1998, a time when Indonesia was shaking off the authoritarian grip of then-President Suharto. Prabowo has consistently denied these allegations.

His victory marks a shift toward dynastic politics in Indonesia, a trend already observed under Jokowi’s rule. Critics have noted the rise of old-school patronage under Jokowi, warning that these networks may undermine the integrity of state institutions, including the judiciary, if left unchecked under Prabowo.

Security for the inauguration is tight, with at least 100,000 police and military personnel deployed across Jakarta, including specialized units like snipers and anti-riot forces. As the city prepares to celebrate the incoming president, foreign dignitaries from around the world, including China’s Vice President Han Zheng and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield, are expected to attend the inauguration.

Prabowo’s administration will face immediate challenges as he seeks to balance his continuity campaign promises with growing concerns over political transparency and human rights. His ability to deliver on ambitious economic targets, maintain stability, and reassure international partners will shape the trajectory of Indonesia’s democracy and its position on the global stage in the coming years.

On November 13, 2024, Somaliland will conduct elections that stand as a testament to its commitment to democracy—a stark contrast to the chaos that has plagued neighboring Somalia for decades. This momentous occasion signals not just a pivotal point in Somaliland’s political journey but also offers a defining model of governance in a region often overshadowed by instability.

An Election Like No Other

The elections will be held for various political offices, including the presidency, under the watchful eyes of both local and international observers. President Muse Bihi Abdi seeks re-election as his government continues to establish Somaliland as a stable democratic entity.

This election is characterized by its inclusive nature, allowing the people of Somaliland to exercise their democratic rights through a one-person, one-vote system. Utilizing advanced biometric technology, including IRIS and BVVS systems, the electoral process sets a new standard for transparency and reliability.

Somaliland has been functioning independently since 1991, will host elections across its regions with Hargeisa—its capital—as the focal point for the electoral commission’s operational activities.

The elections will take place on November 13, 2024, following a period of robust campaigning and political engagement among candidates.

This election is vital for Somaliland as it strengthens national identity and sovereignty, further asserting its distinction from Somalia. By promoting a democratic process free from violence and terror, Somaliland invites the world to witness its electoral integrity amid challenges faced by its southern neighbor.

The Somaliland Electoral Commission has recently received essential equipment, including computers and voting technologies, to implement biometric verification. The arrival of these tools in Hargeisa represents a significant leap toward ensuring the authenticity and efficiency of the elections.

A Commitment to Democracy

In a region often associated with conflict and turmoil, Somaliland proudly strides forward with a democratic process unlike any offered in its neighbor. While Somalia has struggled with a protracted absence of credible elections, marked by the specter of terrorism and piracy, Somaliland showcases a commitment to the rule of law and civic engagement.

Somalia has never hosted an election akin to the upcoming one in Somaliland, which promises transparency and fairness. Commenting on this disparity, President Muse Bihi said, “Our elections will demonstrate to the world the spirit of Somaliland—peace-loving, democratic, and resilient. We strive to uphold values that reflect the wishes of our people.”

Contrastingly, Somalia remains a haven for terrorism, illustrating the failure of governance and stability. As Somaliland positions itself as a beacon of hope, Somalia continues to grapple with violence from groups like Al-Shabaab, leading to skepticism regarding its potential for democratization.

The Global Invitation

Somaliland extends an invitation to the international community to observe its elections and witness a free and fair process. In a time when many Western nations face scrutiny over their own electoral integrity, Somaliland’s embrace of advanced biometric verification serves as an ironic reminder of how a small, self-governing entity can achieve what larger, more established democracies struggle to maintain.

“Watch closely, world. Let our success be a lesson to those who doubt the power of democracy,” urges one local electoral official. “We are crafting our destiny, free from the shadows of terrorism and chaos that our neighbors endure.”

Quotes from Leaders

Echoing the resilience of Somaliland’s commitment to democracy, one prominent local figure remarked, “While Somalia may wallow in its past failures, we at Somaliland are forging a bright future for our people, one election at a time.” This declaration reflects a broader sentiment among Somalilanders who are eager to demonstrate their distinct identity to the global stage.

As the November 13 elections approach, the expectation remains that they will proceed without the turmoil and violence that characterize Somalia’s political environment, allowing Somaliland to present a compelling narrative of success.

Conclusion

The upcoming election is not merely a local event; it signifies a monumental shift toward recognizing the durability of Somaliland’s democracy amidst regional strife. As Hargeisa prepares, the pride of the Somaliland people shines through—their commitment to peace, stability, and democratic values is unmistakable.

About Somaliland Democracy:
Somaliland is in the Horn of Africa, having regained its 1960 independence back in 1991. Since then, it has developed a functional government, established democratic institutions, and maintained a commitment to peace and stability in a volatile region. Despite lacking formal international recognition, Somaliland continues to build a robust democratic identity and invites global partners to support its journey towards full sovereignty and recognition. As it heads into the elections of November 2024, Somaliland stands distinct from Somalia, embodying the ideals of democracy and resilience that the region desperately needs.

In the wake of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar’s death, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris has emphasized that this moment presents an opportunity to both end the conflict in Gaza and secure the release of hostages held by Hamas. Speaking during a campaign stop in Michigan, Harris underscored the Biden administration’s stance on Hamas, while also addressing the need for humanitarian aid and a long-term solution for the Palestinians.

Harris’ remarks came as she navigates a delicate balance between support for Israel and addressing concerns from key Democratic constituencies, including Arab Americans, many of whom are critical of the administration’s backing of Israel’s military campaign. Her prompt response to Sinwar’s death, framed as a significant moment in the ongoing conflict, contrasts sharply with former President Donald Trump’s more delayed and measured reaction. Trump, often outspoken on foreign policy, notably took a softer approach, simply calling Sinwar “not a good person” and suggesting his death could ease the path to peace.

Harris has aimed to project strength on foreign policy, particularly as she faces growing scrutiny over U.S. involvement in the Middle East. The administration’s support for Israel has alienated some progressive and Arab-American voters, but Harris continues to underscore Israel’s right to defend itself while also advocating for Palestinian self-determination and dignity. Her call for more aid to Gaza aligns with growing pressure on the Biden administration to address the humanitarian crisis.

Meanwhile, Trump has sought to solidify his credentials as the most “pro-Israel” candidate, often portraying the Democrats as less supportive of Israel. However, his relative quiet on Sinwar’s death has perplexed analysts, given his usual assertive stance on Middle East issues. Trump’s “America First” approach may explain this reticence, as his base includes voters wary of U.S. entanglements in foreign conflicts.

As the U.S. election draws near, the Gaza conflict remains a contentious issue, with both Harris and Trump navigating complex voter dynamics. While Harris leverages her position to push for a broader diplomatic solution, Trump appears focused on reinforcing his pro-Israel image without delving deeply into the ongoing war.

Analysts are divided on what Sinwar’s death means for the future of the conflict. Some, like White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, suggest it could open the door to a cease-fire, while others warn that Israel’s focus may shift to Lebanon and Hezbollah, complicating efforts for peace in Gaza. With the U.S. already deploying additional troops to the region and reinforcing Israel’s defenses, the situation remains fluid, and both candidates are likely to face further questions on their approach to Middle East policy in the weeks leading up to the election.

Daniel Chapo, the presidential candidate of Mozambique’s ruling party, appears to be on the brink of victory, comfortably leading in nine of the country’s 11 provinces as vote counting continues from last week’s election. With over 50% of the vote in most regions, Chapo is poised to succeed current President Filipe Nyusi, who is stepping down after completing his second and final term.

In the capital, Maputo, Chapo has secured more than 53% of the vote, a significant lead over his nearest rival, independent candidate Venancio Mondlane, who garnered just under 34%. According to Lucilia Sitoe, chairperson of the Maputo Provincial Election Commission, Chapo has maintained his lead at every polling station counted. “Daniel Franscisco Chapo, 656,056, which corresponds to 68.02%. Venancio Antion Bila Mondlane, 260,792, which corresponds to 27.04%,” Sitoe announced, reflecting the overwhelming support for Chapo in key urban areas.

The opposition’s performance has been underwhelming, with Renamo’s candidate, Ossufo Momade, polling just 9.6% in Maputo, while Lutero Simango of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM) lagged with 2.86%. This trend is replicated in several provinces, including traditionally opposition-held areas like Zambezia and Sofala, where Chapo leads with commanding majorities of 73% and 65%, respectively.

Despite Chapo’s apparent dominance, voter turnout in this election was notably low, with less than 50% of Mozambique’s 17 million registered voters participating. The low turnout reflects widespread voter apathy and dissatisfaction with the political landscape. In key northern provinces like Nampula and Zambezia, millions of voters stayed home, and tens of thousands cast blank ballots—a common form of protest in Mozambique. In Cabo Delgado, a province struggling with an Islamist insurgency, nearly a million voters did not participate, and a significant number of ballots were either spoiled or left blank.

While the final results are not expected for another two weeks, Mozambique’s National Election Commission has vowed that every vote will be counted. The chairman emphasized the transparency of the process, noting that representatives from all political parties are present at polling stations to oversee the counting.

As Chapo’s victory looms, attention is already shifting to the significant challenges awaiting the next president. Independent political analyst Dercio Alfazema outlined the public’s expectations, which include tackling corruption, improving security, and enhancing the quality of essential services like healthcare and education. “We are looking for more health service and the quality of education, the extension of the services such as infrastructure,” Alfazema said. He also highlighted pressing issues such as terrorism in the north, kidnappings, and the need for job creation for Mozambique’s young population.

Chapo’s government will face the enormous task of addressing these concerns, especially in regions like Cabo Delgado, which has been ravaged by insurgent violence. The incoming administration will also need to foster economic growth and rebuild trust with a disengaged electorate, as evidenced by the low voter turnout.

If current trends hold, Chapo will be sworn in as president in January 2025, marking a new chapter in Mozambique’s political landscape. The transition comes as President Nyusi steps down after serving two five-year terms, in accordance with the country’s constitution.

Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump will converge on Pennsylvania, a critical battleground state, with campaign events at opposite ends of the state. Harris will address voters in Erie, while Trump will hold a town hall near Philadelphia, reflecting their ongoing efforts to sway Pennsylvania’s decisive electorate ahead of the 2024 election.

Harris’ appearance in Erie, a traditionally Democratic stronghold in the state’s northwest corner, will mark her tenth visit to Pennsylvania this campaign season. Trump, who continues to rally his Republican base, has also made Pennsylvania a key focus, visiting Scranton and Reading just last week. Both figures are vying for the attention of the state’s few remaining undecided voters in what promises to be another closely contested race.

Pennsylvania, which boasts 19 electoral votes—the most of any swing state—has seen a steady stream of visits from both Democratic and Republican candidates. Monday’s events will bring the total to 46 campaign stops in the state, underscoring its strategic importance. With mail-in voting already underway and millions of ballots expected to be cast, the race to secure Pennsylvania’s electoral votes has intensified.

Energy policy, particularly around natural gas fracking, is expected to be a central topic as Harris and Trump address Pennsylvania voters. The state, rich in natural resources and home to a robust energy industry, is deeply divided on issues surrounding fracking and environmental regulation. Harris, representing the Biden administration’s climate-conscious agenda, will likely emphasize renewable energy and economic opportunities for transitioning workers. Trump, on the other hand, is expected to highlight his support for the fossil fuel industry and the jobs it provides, positioning himself as a defender of the state’s energy sector.

Erie, where Harris will hold her rally, is a Democratic-leaning city surrounded by more conservative rural areas. Erie County has long been viewed as a bellwether region in Pennsylvania, reflecting the state’s moderate and often unpredictable voting tendencies. Trump himself visited Erie on September 29, acknowledging the city’s pivotal role in deciding the state’s outcome.

Harris will use the rally to promote early voting and energize key constituencies, including Black voters. In a bid to bolster support, she plans to visit a Black-owned small business before the rally, underscoring the Biden administration’s initiatives aimed at expanding economic opportunities for Black men. This outreach is part of a broader Democratic strategy to galvanize a key voting bloc that will be essential for victory in November.

Meanwhile, Trump will host a town hall at the Greater Philadelphia Expo Center in Oaks, a suburb of the state’s largest city. The former president hopes to mobilize his supporters in the populous southeastern part of the state, which has traditionally leaned Democratic in presidential elections but remains crucial to Republican turnout efforts. Trump’s 2016 victory in Pennsylvania, where he edged out Hillary Clinton by just over 40,000 votes, was fueled in part by high turnout in rural and suburban areas. In contrast, his loss to Joe Biden in 2020 by around 80,000 votes demonstrated the challenge of holding onto that coalition amid shifting demographics.

With Pennsylvania often deciding the outcome of national elections, both Harris and Trump are banking on the state’s swing voters. While Democrats have won the last three gubernatorial elections and both U.S. Senate seats are held by Democrats, the state’s legislature remains closely divided, reflecting the polarized nature of its electorate.

As the 2024 election approaches, Pennsylvania remains the most contested prize, outpacing Michigan and Wisconsin in candidate visits. Both campaigns are pouring resources into the state, hoping to break what was once considered the Democrats’ “blue wall” that Trump managed to dismantle in 2016. With millions of Pennsylvanians already voting, the battle for the state’s 19 electoral votes is set to be fierce, with the potential to decide the direction of the country for years to come.

A man was arrested on gun charges at a security checkpoint near a rally for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in California on Saturday. The Riverside County sheriff’s office reported that the man, identified as 49-year-old Vem Miller of Las Vegas, was found in possession of two guns and a high-capacity magazine. He was stopped by deputies in a black SUV and taken into custody without incident.

Authorities emphasized that the incident did not pose a threat to the safety of Trump or the rally attendees. The rally was held in the Coachella Valley, a location more widely recognized for its annual music and arts festival.

Miller was charged with possession of a loaded firearm and a high-capacity magazine. After being booked, he was released on $5,000 bail on the same day. Further details about the charges have not been disclosed, and Miller has not yet made any public comments regarding the arrest.

This incident comes in the wake of several previous security threats against Trump. In July, the former president narrowly survived an assassination attempt when a bullet grazed his ear during a rally in Pennsylvania. Another man was charged in September for attempting to assassinate Trump after being found with a rifle near Trump’s Palm Beach golf course. He pleaded not guilty.

Despite these incidents, Trump continues to hold rallies across the country as part of his campaign for the 2024 presidential election.